![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0033.png)
Volume 6, Issue 4 (Suppl)
Clin Pharmacol Biopharm, an open access journal
ISSN: 2167-065X
Page 87
Euro Biopharma & Ethnopharmacology 2017
November 09-11, 2017
&
6
th
International Conference and Exhibition on
November 09-11, 2017 Vienna, Austria
4
th
EUROPEAN BIOPHARMA CONGRESS
PHARMACOLOGY AND ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Joint Event
Exploration of phytotherapies common among local communities of rawalakot, district poonch azad
jammu and kashmir
Mirza Faisal Qaseem
1
and
Humaira Shaheen
2
1
Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan
2
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Pakistan
E
thnopharmacology act as bridge among medical, natural, and social sciences with most of its research focusing on
chemical, biological, and pharmacological sciences. Medicinal plants are a basic source of health care in the Pearl Valley
District Poonch of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, a mountainous region of Pakistan. Although some ethnobotanical researches
have been carried out in the district, the work reported here is the first field study on medical ethnobotany in Rawalakot area.
Information about the therapeutic properties of the medicinal plants was collected from 46 laypeople and 18 herbalists by
using an open ended and semistructured questionnaire. The data about the use of plants was recorded into a synoptic table
containing ethnobotanical inventory of plants, parts used, therapeutic indication and mode of application or administration.
Different ethnobotanical indices were calculated in order to quantify the knowledge on the medicinal plants reported in the
study. Our study recorded 136 species of medicinal plants belonging to 45 families. Asteraceae (14 species) was the dominant
family in the area, followed by Lamiaceae (11 species), Fabaceae, and Rosaceae (5 species each). Herbaceous plants (55%) were
the most used, with leaves (31%) as the most exploited plant part. Decoction (26 species), juice and powder (24 species each)
were the most common methods of preparation. The highest use values (UVs) were reported for
Berberis lyceum and Ajuga
bracteosa
(1.13 each), Abies pindrow (1.03),
Prunella vulgaris and Adiantum capillus-veneris
(1.00 each). Highest informant
consensus (ICF) values were recorded for digestive system diseases (ICF = 0.90), muscular and skeletal system diseases (ICF =
0.89), and mouth/pharynx diseases and diabetes (ICF = 0.86 each). When we compared data of this study with those of other
studies carried out in neighboring areas, we observed that the percentage of similarity in uses of plant species ranged from
13.33% to 34.62% with an average value of 22.53%. The present study revealed the importance to document and launch list of
all the possible plants that are used in phytotherapies in the unexplored study area. The present study is useful in preservation
of indigenous knowledge and could attract future researchers to investigate and explore phytochemicals responsible for
medicinal properties of these plants.
faisal.ali522@gmail.comClin Pharmacol Biopharm 2017, 6:4(Suppl)
DOI: 10.4172/2167-065X-C1-026