Previous Page  39 / 42 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 42 Next Page
Page Background

Page 98

CNS 2016

December 05-07, 2016

Volume 7, Issue 5(Suppl)

J Neurol Neurophysiol

ISSN: 2155-9562 JNN, an open access journal

conferenceseries

.com

December 05-07, 2016 Dubai, UAE

2

nd

International Conference on

Central Nervous System Disorders & Therapeutics

J Neurol Neurophysiol 2016, 7:5(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.C1.041

Opioid reward mechanisms: A potential role in metabolic disturbances

Igor Elman

Boonshoft School of Medicine- Wright State University, USA

Introduction:

Obesity and overeatingmay be construed as a behavioral addiction. In schizophrenia, obesity is twice as prevalent

as in the general public afflicting over 50% of the patients and shortening their lifespan by about 15 years. Although excessive

consumption of fast food and pharmacotherapy with second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs) has been implicated in

the schizophrenia/obesity comorbidity, the pathophysiology of this link remains unclear. The mechanism proposed here is

based on the central opioidergic system owing to opioids’ role in: enhancing reward features of food; boosting orexigenic and

suppressing anorexigenic neuropeptides; reducing peripheral insulin secretion and; desensitizing insulin receptors.

Aim:

The aim of this presentation is to discuss a heuristic value of opioid blockade for patients’ metabolic status.

Method:

Translational evidence to be presented in support of the above contention includes a preclinical and two clinical

studies. First, four groups of Wistar Han IGS rats were treated for 28 days with an SGA olanzapine, a combination of olanzapine

and an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, naltrexone alone or vehicle, and their food consumption and body weight were

measured daily for the first nine days and every other day thereafter. Second, a potential mechanism of naltrexone action

was explored in 15 patients with heroin dependence who underwent the standard sweet taste test before- and seven days

after the injection of depot naltrexone. Third, we also conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial where

schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients on a stable dose of olanzapine were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive

naltrexone (n=14) or placebo (n=16).

Results:

Rats treated with olanzapine and naltrexone were similar to the vehicle-treated animals with respect to food intake and

body weight gain, whereas olanzapine treatment alone induced overeating and obesity (p<0.001 group-by-time interaction).

Data from heroin dependent human subjects demonstrated a reduction in the hedonic and motivational ratings of sweet

solutions (p<0.05) after naltrexone suggesting a potential mechanism of action. On the clinical trial, in comparison to the

olanzapine and placebo combination, the olanzapine and naltrexone group displayed a significant decrease in the fat mass

(p<0.01), assessed with the biometric impedance analysis and a trend towards improvement in the insulin resistance quantified

via HOMA-IR values (p=0.09).

Conclusions:

Naltrexone addition may result in clinically meaningful attenuation of olanzapine-induced metabolic side

effects. Potential mechanisms of naltrexone action may involve diminution of rewarding features of food in conjunction with

favorable effects on insulin sensitivity. If confirmed, these results may contribute to the identification of an inexpensive and

effective treatment that specifically targets the underlying pathophysiologic effects of SGAs and provides a substantial clinical

benefit to the risk population.

Igor.elman@wright.edu