Previous Page  24 / 29 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 29 Next Page
Page Background

Page 69

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 5, Issue 2 (Suppl)

J Infect Dis Ther 2017

ISSN: 2332-0877, JIDT an open access journal

Infection Congress 2017

May 11-12, 2017

May 11-12, 2017 Barcelona, Spain

4

th

International Congress on

Infectious Diseases

J Infect Dis Ther 2017, 5:2 (Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2332-0877-C1-024

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenopathy

Abhenil Mittal, Surendra K Sharma, Neeraj Nischal, R M Pandey, M C Sharma

and

Jigyasa Chaubey

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Background:

Extra pulmonary TB (EPTB) constitutes 15-20% of all TB cases globally. The most common form of EPTB is lymph

node TB (LNTB). Culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis; however, its sensitivity is low. Hence, other modalities are needed

for rapid and accurate diagnosis

Materials & Methods:

345 adult patients with lymphadenopathy from outpatient and inpatient departments of AIIMS, New Delhi

were recruited between April 2015 and June 2016 after obtaining written informed consent. All patients were subjected to either

FNAC or excision biopsy. Zeihl-Neelsen staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture by MGIT 960 and histopathology was done and

response to treatment was assessed at three months. Xpert MTB/RIF was compared against a composite reference standard (CRS)

using standard 2*2 table. Definite cases by CRS were those that were culture positive whereas probable and possible cases included

those with symptoms, positive ZN stain or histopathology and those who responded to treatment.

Results:

Out of 345, 185 were males and 160 were females with a mean age of 31.69 years. 18 patients were retro positive and 57

patients were treatment experienced. 185 patients underwent FNAC out of which 70 (42.6%) were inconclusive as compared to three

(1.8%) in the biopsy group. Among ATT naïve patients which were definite by CRS, Xpert MTB/RIF had a sensitivity of 81.03%

(69.15-89.07) with a specificity of 98.01% (94.32-99.32). In ATT experienced definite cases, sensitivity was 77.8% (54.78-91) and

specificity was 100% (74.12-100). Similar results were seen in ATT naïve/experienced “probable/possible” cases.

Conclusions:

It can be concluded that Xpert MTB/RIF could be used as a rapid and accurate test for diagnosis of LNTB irrespective

of prior treatment status of the patient. Also excisional biopsy may be preferred for obtaining samples in patients with easily accessible

nodes due to better yield.

drabhenil@gmail.com