Page 149
Notes:
conferenceseries
.com
Volume 10, Issue 8 (Suppl)
J Proteomics Bioinform, an open access journal
ISSN: 0974-276X
Structural Biology 2017
September 18-20, 2017
9
th
International Conference on
Structural Biology
September 18-20, 2017 Zurich, Switzerland
Structural and functional characterization of natural variants of G protein-coupled receptors
Hee Ryung Kim
and
Ka Young Chung
Sungkyunkwan University, Korea
G
protein-coupled receptors are the largest superfamily of transmembrane receptors and have vital signaling functions
in various organs. Because of their critical roles in physiology and pathology, GPCRs are the most commonly used
therapeutic target. It has been suggested that GPCRs undergo massive genetic variations such as genetic polymorphisms
and DNA insertions or deletions. Among these genetic variations, non-synonymous natural variations change the amino
acid sequence and could thus alter GPCR functions such as expression, localization, signaling, and ligand binding, which
may be involved in disease development and altered responses to GPCR-targeting drugs. Despite the clinical importance of
GPCRs, studies on the genotype-phenotype relationship of GPCR natural variants have been limited to a few GPCRs such
as β-adrenergic receptors and opioid receptors. Here, we analyzed the non-synonymous natural variants of all non-olfactory
GPCRs available from a public database, UniProt. The results suggest that the GPCR superfamily undergoes non-synonymous
natural variations at a high frequency especially in the N-terminus and TM domains. However, our analysis also suggests that
only a few non-synonymous natural variations have been studied in efforts to link the variations with functional consequences.
Therefore, we propose to provide insights into understanding the correlation between cellular function, structure and genetic
variations.
Biography
Hee Ryung Kim is doing her PhD in Sungkyunkwan University in Korea. Her interest is to study conformational dynamics of G protein-coupled receptors and its
downstream signaling molecules using Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry. So far, she has been analyzing conformational dynamics of various
GPCR-G protein complexes and β-arrestin mutants. Her goal is to elucidate the molecular mechanism of G protein-dependent and independent signaling pathways
via
structural comparison between GPCR-G protein and GPCR-arrestin complexes. As structure plays a key role in protein function, her studies will provide the
fundamental information of G protein and arrestin activation. In addition, it may contribute to the development of selective drug with fewer side effects, as an
example of Structure-Based Drug Design.
heeryung.jan.kim@gmail.comHee Ryung Kim et al., J Proteomics Bioinform 2017, 10:8(Suppl)
DOI: 10.4172/0974-276X-C1-0101
Figure1:
General description of the five
families of GPCRs.
(A) The structural domains of GPCRs. (B-
F) Representations of the conserved and
various features of the Rhodopsin (B),
Secretin (C), Adhesion (D), Glutamate (E),
and Frizzled (F) families