data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f7a0/1f7a0215f74f73c297109664a3b98bb08a8f9061" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd070/bd0700db28c6e62b6d122a2d472cbef716ce7b4b" alt="Page Background"
Notes:
Page 55
Pharma & Clinical Pharmacy Congress 2016
November 07-09, 2016
Volume 5 Issue 4(Suppl)
Clin Pharmacol Biopharm
ISSN: 2167-065X CPB, an open access journal
conferenceseries
.com
November 07-09, 2016 Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
4
th
International
Pharma & Clinical Pharmacy Congress
Mei Zhan, Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 2016, 5:4(Suppl)
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-065X.C1.023Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional Bevacizumab to chemotherapy for malignant pleural
mesothelioma from a Chinese perspective
Mei Zhan
West China Hospital, China
Objective:
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) for malignant pleural
mesothelioma (MPM) following a phase III trial that show an overall survival (OS) benefit with the addition of bevacizumab.
Methods:
A Markov decision tree based on the mesothelioma avastin cisplatin pemetrexed study (MAPS) was created,
comparing bevacizumab+PC to PC alone. Three health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease and death) were
analyzed in a Markov model. The costs were calculated from the Chinese societal perspective. Results were reported in quality-
adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
Results:
Bevacizumab+PC came at an ICER of $323343.46 per QALY, which are much more than the accepted willingness-to-
pay (WTP) threshold of $23970.00 per QALY in China.
Conclusions:
Addition of bevacizumab to PC is not a cost-effective first-line treatment for MPM when compared with PC in
China.
Biography
Mei Zhan has graduated from Sichuan University and currently working as a Clinical Pharmacist in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. She has published
more than 17 papers in journals of repute.
mandyzhanmei@163.com