Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 / 15 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 15 Next Page
Page Background

Page 40

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 9

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

ISSN: 2155-9600

Clinical Nutrition 2019

March 04-06, 2019

March 04-06, 2019 | Barcelona, Spain

24

th

International Conference on

Clinical Nutrition

Glutamine use in pelvic sarcopenia: A prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study

Birkan Ilhan

1

, Gulistan Bahat

2

, Nalan Capan

2

, Cihan Kilic

2

, Cenk Yasa

2

, Funda Gungor

2

, Ozlem Persil Ozkan

3

, Ayse Karan

2

and

Mehmet Akif Karan

2

1

Dr. Ersin Arslan Research and Training Hospital, Turkey

2

Istanbul University, Turkey

3

Istanbul Arel University, Turkey

T

he pelvic floor muscles are important in the maintenance of continence. The weakness of muscles may lead

to stress incontinence and facilitate urgency and functional incontinence. We aimed to determine the effect

of additional oral glutamine supplementation to Kegel exercise on pelvic floor strength and clinical parameters

of urinary incontinence in females. Females with urinary incontinence were included. Digital test and a vaginal

manometer were used for measuring the strength of the pelvic floor muscles. Twenty four hours pad weight test

was examined. Participants were randomized into 2 groups as oral glutamine 30 g/day and placebo. It was asked to

use the supplementation and Kegel exercises to all participants for 3 months. Basic and 3rd month measurements

were compared. Also, the progression between measurements at basic and 3rd months was compared. There were

11 patients in the glutamine arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm. Mean age was 58.2±6.6 years. There was no

age difference between the groups [glutamine 59±3.8, placebo 57.8±7.9 years, p>0.05]. In glutamine arm, vaginal

muscle strength assessed by digital test was higher at the end of 3 months [2.9±0.7 vs. 4±0.9; 0-3 months respectively,

p=0.014]; perineometer measurements were not statistically different [27.4±8.3 vs. 31.2±8.9; 0-3 months respectively,

p>0.05]; 24 hour pad weight was not different [p>0.05]. In the placebo arm, there was statistically significant

progress in vaginal muscle strength assessed by both digital test and perineometer and 24-hour pad weight (p values:

0.005, 0.011, and 0.002 respectively). When we compare the progression scores between the groups; there was no

statistically significant difference [p>0.05]. Our study suggests that glutamine supplementation does not provide

additional benefit in the treatment of pelvic muscle sarcopenia in patients without protein-energy-malnutrition.

birkanilhan@hotmail.com

J Nutr Food Sci 2019, Volume 9

DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600-C2-093