Previous Page  9 / 29 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 29 Next Page
Page Background

Page 85

Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System | ISSN: 2161-069X | Volume: 8

&

&

October 29-30, 2018 | San Francisco, USA

International Conference on

Gastrointestinal Cancer and Therapeutics

4

th

World Congress on

Digestive & Metabolic Diseases

26

th

Annual Congress on

Cancer Science and Targeted Therapies

FIT vs Colonoscopy: Using social determinants to optimize colorectal cancer screening in a urban

underserved population

Gordon Taylor Moffat

State University of New York, USA

Statement of problem or question:

Will improved shared decision making around FIT or colonoscopy screening based on

social determinants improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates in underserved populations?

Objectives of program/intervention:

To compare screening completion rates of FIT vs colonoscopy in an urban underserved

population To improve CRC screening completion rates

Description of program/intervention

: A retrospective analysis reviewed baseline colon cancer screening rates in resident

clinic patients seen between January and February 2017. The intervention was to encourage residents to discuss the pros and

cons of FIT and colonoscopy for CRC screening allowing patients to choose their preferred modality. A prospective cohort

study reviewed charts from September 1 to Dec 31st 2017 to assess completion of screening. Primary endpoint: overall CRC

screening rate.

Measures of success:

Overall CRC screening rates pre and post intervention were assessed. A subgroup analysis of FIT and

colonoscopy completion rates was performed pre and post intervention.

Findings to date:

The study population consisted largely of Afro-Caribbean patients, 50 years and older with average risk

factors at a resident clinic in an urban safety net institution. Of the 52 patients reviewed in the baseline analysis, 9 (17%) FIT

and 43 (71%) colonoscopies were ordered, with completion rates of 78% and 26% respectively, and an overall rate of 34%.

Post-intervention, 42 patients agreed to screening between October and December 2017. Of these 42 patients, 30 chose FIT

(71%) and 12 favored colonoscopies (29%). Due to the short follow up period, no colonoscopies were completed, however, 73%

of FIT testing was still able to be performed. The overall post-intervention completion rate was 52%.

Key lessons for determination:

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer among men and

women and is projected to cause more than 50,000 deaths in 2017, only 62.6% of adults 50 years and older were screened.

Access, insurance/immigration status, education, and ethnicity impact cancer screening. Urban underserved populations are

disproportionately affected by these barriers.

Subjects who chose FIT testing were more likely to complete testing compared to those who chose colonoscopy. While

colonoscopy is often offered as a first line for CRC screening, it may not be ideal for patient populations that have more

socioeconomic barriers. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines consider both modalities equally valid for CRC

screening. This study demonstrates that improving shared decision-making between patients and providers can decrease

barriers to screening, and improve CRC completion rates.

Biography

Gordon Taylor Moffat has his experience in Life Sciences with an Honors in Biology with training in Radiology. His passion for science and interest in microbiology

lead him to pursue and obtain a Doctor of Medicine. Currently he is working at the State University of New York Brooklyn Health Sciences Center in Internal

Medicine and the forthcoming Medicine Chief Resident. His professional interests include: Medical Oncology, Hospice and Palliative Medicine, and Geriatric

Medicine. He is currently working on research projects at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in Manhattan, New York that are expected to be published. He

is also a candidate for the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society Postgraduate Fellowship Award.

gordon.moffat@downstate.edu

Gordon Taylor Moffat, J Gastrointest Dig Syst 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-069X-C8-086