Previous Page  12 / 22 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

Page 82

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8

Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials

ISSN: 2155-952X

Biotech Congress 2018 & Enzymology 2018

March 05-07, 2018

JOINT EVENT

20

th

Global Congress on

Biotechnology

3

rd

International Conference on

Enzymology and Molecular Biology

&

March 05-07, 2018 London, UK

Structure/function of 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS) synthase (PAPSS)

K V Venkatachalam

Nova Southeastern University, USA

3

’-Phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate synthase (PAPSS) catalyzes the formation of PAPS from inorganic sulfate and ATP.

In the first step inorganic sulfate combines with ATP to form adenosine 5’-phosphosulfate (APS) and pyrophosphate (PPi)

catalyzed by the ATP sulfurylase domain. In the second step APS kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of APS at the 3’ hydroxyl

of APS to form PAPS and ADP. PAPSS utilizes 2 moles of ATP and cleaves it differently during PAPS formation, a feature that

is unique only to PAPSS. ATP sulfurylase domain cleaves the ATP at the alpha-beta position whereas the APS kinase domain

splits the ATP between beta-gamma position. The alpha-beta cleavage of ATP among all ATP sulfurylases share the common

motif RNPxHxxH and henceforth it is called Venk-Ettrich motif. Site directed mutagenesis and computational modeling

confirms the role of HNGH residues on alpha-beta splitting of ATP. The beta-gamma splitting of ATP contains a typical Walker

A motif. Further studies are underway to look at the details of the reaction mechanism. Our overall aim is to look at 1. How 3D

structure of PAPSS determines the enzyme function? 2. Studying the roles of specific amino acid residues and the dynamics of

it in aqueous solution. 3. Making explicit structural and thermodynamic predictions of ligand binding. 4. Understanding the

structural/functional consequences of the proteins due to DNA mutations among various human populations.

venk@nova.edu

J Biotechnol Biomater 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2155-952X-C2-092