Previous Page  19 / 20 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 5, Issue 3(Suppl)

Biochem Anal Biochem 2016

ISSN: 2161-1009, Biochem an open access journal

Page 60

Biochemistry 2016

October 10-12, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

Biochemistry

October 10-12, 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

International Conference on

Evaluation of nephrotoxicity induced by chemotherapy with salts platinum between Cockcroft-Gault

method and MDRD method

Ibtissem Kihel

Sidi Bel Abbes University, Algeria

T

he platinum salts are one of the most chemotherapy drugs used in cancer (particularly in the lung, bladder, testis, ovary, cervix,

endometrial, colon and rectum), however they have a potential renal toxicity requiring an evaluation of tolerance kidney patients

before and after treatment cures. This study compares the different methods of assessing renal function used for patients receiving

chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin (between the measurement of plasma urea, and the calculation of creatinine clearance

as well as changes in the methods of estimating creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft-Gault method and the MDRD method

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease). The study was performed on 25 male patients aged 42-74 years admitted to the Oncology

Department of the University Hospital Oran for treatment of various cancers, mainly lung cancer. After the spectrophotometric

determination of plasma creatinine and urea, the creatinine clearance was calculated by the methods of Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD,

the distribution of the urea after the platinum salt of cure is essentially inside the reference interval with an average of (0.38 and 0.36

g/l) after the first treatment and cure 2

nd

respectively, while the clearance of creatinine is below the range with an average of (69.28 and

72.25 ml/min) after the 1

st

and 2

nd

cure respectively, we see that for older patients over age 65 underestimation clearance calculated

by Cockcroft-Gault, however it is overestimated by the same method in patients weighing more than 70 kg. Indeed, the evaluation of

nephrotoxicity cannot be done on a simple determination of urea or plasma creatinine, but it requires the calculation of creatinine

clearance by Cockcroft-Gault or MDRD methods depending on the age and patient weight.

kihelibtissem@hotmail.fr

Biochem Anal Biochem 2016, 5:3(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-1009.S1.006

Effect of anti-diabetic drugs and adipokine levels

Rabia Farooq

1

, Shajrul Amin

2

and

Sabhiya Majid

1

1

Government Medical College, India

2

University of Kashmir, India

T

2DM is a consequence of complex interactions among multiple genetic variants and environmental risk factors. This complex

disorder is also characterized by changes in various adipokine. In this study, our objective was to estimate the levels of adiponectin,

leptin and resistin (ALR) in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients, besides studying the effect of various drugs on their levels.

Study participants included 400 diabetic and 300 normal patients from the Department of Endocrinology and Department of

Biochemistry, Government Medical College Srinagar. Subjects were categorized under various groups i.e., (group one: metformin

treated), (group two: Glimepiride treated) and cases were also categorized as obese with T2DM (group A), obese without T2DM

(group B) and T2DM only (group C). The serum ALR levels were estimated by ELISA (Alere), and also biochemical parameters

were evaluated before and after treatment. Adiponectin levels were found to be significantly lower in T2DM cases as compared to

controls (12±5.5 vs. 22.5±7.9 μg/ml), while as leptin and resistin levels were found to be significantly higher than controls (14.3±7.4

vs. 7.36±3.73ng/ml) (13.4±1.56 vs. 7.236±2.129 pg/ml). Taking the effect of drugs into consideration, the effect on adiponectin and

resistin levels were found to be highly significant in group two before and after treatment (11±5 vs. 19.2±4.5 μg/ml) (13.6±2.5 vs.

7.3±2.9 pg/ml), while as more effect was observed in leptin among group one (metformin) treated cases (27±15 ng/ml vs. 15±15 ng/

ml). Further the adiponectin levels were found to be significantly lower in group B, while as leptin and resistin levels were found to be

significantly higher among obese cases when compared to T2DM cases only. Glimepiride also shows more effect on FBG, HbA1c%

levels while as metformin shows more effect on lipid profile levels. From the study, it can be concluded that ALR levels are affected

by use of anti-diabetic drugs among which glimepiride shows more effect on adiponectin and resistin levels while leptin gets affected

more by metformin. It can also be proposed that ALR levels are not affected by diabetes only, suggesting that their alterations in

T2DM may be due to obesity as we observed more ALR changes in obese cases when compared to T2DM cases and so there might

be an important link between adiposity and Insulin resistance.

rabiajan4uuu@gmail.com