Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  77 / 103 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 77 / 103 Next Page
Page Background

Page 115

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 10, Issue 8 (Suppl)

J Proteomics Bioinform, an open access journal

ISSN: 0974-276X

Structural Biology 2017

September 18-20, 2017

9

th

International Conference on

Structural Biology

September 18-20, 2017 Zurich, Switzerland

Arfaxad Reyes Alcaraz, J Proteomics Bioinform 2017, 10:8(Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/0974-276X-C1-0100

Structural conformational changes report biased agonism: The case of galanin receptors

Arfaxad Reyes Alcaraz

Korea University, South Korea

Statement of the Problem:

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as seven-transmembrane receptors are the

largest family of cell-surface receptors that communicate extracellular stimuli to the cell interior. To date it has been widely

accepted synthetic ligands targeting the same receptor can stabilize multiple active structural conformations having therefore

differential signaling that eventually results in different physiological responses a phenomenon better known as biased

agonism. However biased agonism might not only be restricted to synthetic ligands but also to endogenous ligands targeting

the same receptor which may explain such a ligand redundancy, suggesting the existence of endogenous biased agonism as a

physiological mechanism.

Methodology &Theoretical Orientation:

The aimof this study was to establish a relationship between conformational changes

in galanin receptors and their signaling properties in living cells. For that purpose, we developed a structural complementation

assay based on NanoBit technology and a series of conformational fluorescein arsenical hairpin (FIAsH) bioluminescence

resonance energy transfer (BRET) biosensors to monitor structural changes of β-arrestin 2 induced by binding with each

galanin receptor.

Findings:

Here we showed that galanin receptors impose different conformational signatures in β-arrestin, moreover

structurally different ligands activating the same receptor imposed different conformations in β-arrestin 2 producing biased

signaling.

Conclusion & Significance:

Our data provide definite evidence that a receptor activated by structurally different ligands can

adopt multiple active conformations. Moreover, this finding also demonstrates that functionally specific structural galanin

receptor conformations can indeed be translated to downstream effectors producing a different physiological response.

Biography

Arfaxad Reyes Alcaraz has his expertise in structure and stability of G-protein coupled receptors and passion for improving and creating new drug discovery

platforms that greatly contribute in the development of more selective drugs with minor side effects. His studies about biased agonism in galanin receptors helped

to understand the relationship between conformational structure of the receptor and its corresponding physiological effect induced by a specific ligand. Recently, he

and his co-workers were able to develop a highly selective agonist for galanin receptor 2 with anxiolytic effect

in vivo

which was the base to discover how different

ligand structures induce different conformations on the structure of galanin receptors. His works greatly contribute to understand the relationship between structure

and function of galanin receptors.

aramarfa47@gmail.com

Figure: A) Five NLuc-ß-arrestin 2-FIASH BRET structural biosensors (F1-F5) were

constructed by inserting the amino acid motif CCPGCC after amino acid residues 40,

140, 171 263 and 410 of ß-arrestin2. The location of each FIASH motif is shown in

relation to the globular N and C domains of ß-arrestin2. B) Diagram of the structural

complementation assay used to measure in real time binding between ß-arrestin2

and Galanin receptors. C) Schematic diagram depicting levels of conformational

aberration produced in different areas of the receptor upon stabilization of receptor

conformations by different agonists. Arrows depict various regions of interaction of the

receptor with cytosolic proteins such as different G-proteins and ß-arrestin. It might

be surmised that dissimilar conformations affect these various regions to varying

degrees causing respective differences in effect for diverse coupling mechanisms.