Previous Page  19 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

Page 63

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 5, Issue 3 (Suppl)

Occup Med Health Aff, an open access journal

ISSN:2329-6879

Occupational Health-2017

September 13-14, 2017

.

September 13-14, 2017 | Dallas, USA

Occupational Health & Safety

6

th

International Conference and Exhibition on

Occup Med Health Aff 2017, 5:3 (Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2329-6879-C1-035

Assessment of risks in operation theatre staff: healthcare failure mode and effect analysis

Shiva Devarakonda

Armed Forces Medical College, India

Background:

OT staff are at risk for injury in the operating room daily. Estimates of 400,000 sharp injuries happen every year in the

US, with around a quarter of these being sustained by surgeons. In 2011/12, an estimated 1.1 million people in UK suffered from an

illness that was caused by their work. Over the last decade, there have been five million lost working days from self-reported work-

related injuries and illnesses in the health and social care sector within the UK. The present study was conducted to evaluate the

selected risk processes of Operation Theatre department of a Tertiary care teaching hospital in India by using analysis method of the

conditions and failure effects in health care.

Methods:

A mixed method approach of qualitative action research, quantitative cross-sectional and the HFMEA of the care processes

involved in the surgical care pathways of the patients in operation theatre was done to identify and analyze the failure modes and

their effects on staff safety. The identified modes and causes are classified according to the Eindhoven Model and the strategies for

improvement are determined by the creative problem-solving technique.

Results:

In five selected processes by voting method using rating, 23 steps, 61 sub-processes and 217 potential failure modes were

identified by HFMEA. A total of 25 (11.5%) major failure modes and 54 (31%) potential causes that are quantitatively measured

as high risk are transferred to the decision tree. Training and Retraining, Communication Skills, Standardization, Monitoring and

Control were the solutions generated for enhancing the employee safety.

Conclusion:

UsingHFMEA to identify the possible errors in care processes, causes of each failuremode, and strategies of improvement

is highly effective, and prospective risk analysis in healthcare sector is proposed to transmit an organizational culture from the type

of reaction to the type of error prevention.

satya.sumy@gmail.com