Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 26 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 26 Next Page
Page Background

Page 71

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8

Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System

ISSN: 2161-069X

Gastro Congress 2018

August 20-21, 2018

August 20-21, 2018 | Rome, Italy

13

th

Euro-Global

Gastroenterology Conference

The effectiveness of the new method of radial sphincterotomy

Kenan Yusif Zade

Military Hospital of State Border Service, Azerbaijan

Introduction:

In choledocholithiasis subject to the size of the stone and the anatomical structure of the papilla the size of the

cross-section in sphincterotomy may vary. Sufficiently large incision in sphincterotomy leads to the increase in the incidence

of complications after ERCP as perforation, cholangitis, and pancreatitis.

Materials &Methodology:

We performed 77 ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography) operations in patients

with a diagnosis of "choledocholithiasis". In the first group (59 patients) we performed standard sphincterotomy incision in 11,

12 or 13 o’clock direction, in the second group (18 patients) - "radial" sphincterotomy. The technique of "radial" sphincterotomy

we developed allows to make several lateral incisions in 11, 12 and 13 o’clock directions. Thus, the main incision can be made

up to transverse fold, and other radial incisions shall be made below the transverse folds, without going beyond the boundaries

of the assumed course of intramural choledoch. Thus, the complete cross section of the incision with additional insections at

the radial sphincterotomy becomes 1.5 times larger than the main incision in standard sphincterotomy.

Results:

In the first group periampullary diverticulum was 16.7%, while in the second group - 47.4%. Number of stones in the

first group – 2.25±0.49, in the second – 2.22±0.32, sizes of the stones – 10.07±4.93 and 19.01±3.31 mm, respectively. In the first

group, complications occurred in 3 (5.08%) patients: in 1 of them - post-ERCP pancreatitis, in 2 - bleeding during the session.

In the second group, only 1 (5.5%) patient had pancreatitis and other early and late complications. In the first group with 3

patients - the common bile duct stone removal was achieved in two sessions with a few day interval, the remaining - in a single

session. In the 2

nd

group, all patients required only one session. No cases of mortality occurred in any of the groups.

Conclusions:

Radial sphincterotomy technique was substantiated from anatomical and mathematical aspects. The proposed

technique is a safe way to increase the area of dissected papillae ensuring efficient removal of large stones through such incision.

Recent Publications:

1. Yusif Zade K R (2014) Rationale for the effectiveness of the new method of radial sphincterotomy in the obstruction

of extrahepatic biliary tract. Kazan Medical Journal. 956(6):816-821.

2. Zhang W J et al. (2015) Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. BMC

Surgery. 15:7.

3. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U and Parsi M A (2013) Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct

stones. World J. Gastroenterol. 19(2):165-173.

4. Heo J H et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal

of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 66(4):720-726.

Biography

Kenan Yusif Zade holds an MD and PhD Degree from Azerbaijan Medical University, Azerbaijan. He also holds an MBA Degree from Maastricht School of

Management, The Netherlands and EMBA Degree from ADA University, Azerbaijan. He is the Head of Military Hospital of State Border Service, Azerbaijan. His

professional fields are general surgery, gastroenterology and invasive endoscopy. In 2007, he founded an Association of Turkish-Azerbaijani Endoscopic Surgeons.

He is also the President-Elect (2017-2019) of Ambroise Paré International Military Surgery Forum (APIMSF). His second education is Business Management.

yusifzadekr@yahoo.com

Kenan Yusif Zade, J Gastrointest Dig Syst 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-069X-C5-076