Previous Page  6 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Page 28

conferenceseries

.com

September 02-03, 2019 | Berlin, Germany

6

th

World Conference on Climate Change

Volume 10

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change

ISSN: 2157-7617

Climate Change 2019

September 02-03, 2019

Forest management and C-allocation of beech (

Fagus sylvatica

)

Johannes Eichhorn

and

Caroline Klinck

The Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Germany

Statement of the Problem:

Does forest management contribute towards assuring carbon storage in beech

forests?Forests store carbon to a large extent above and below ground.Solid volume beech shows a high increasing

above-ground C supply of about 120 t C/ha. The below-ground value is about 160 t C/ha (excluding moors; Evers

et al., 2019, Wördehoff et al., 2011)). The stability of C-supplies in forests depends mainly on the vitality of above-

ground biomass. As exemplary indicators the annual mortality rate, fructification and the foliation of beech are

presented.

Methodology and Theoretical Orientation:

The basis of the data stems from the forest monitoring in north-west

German federal states ranging from 1984 up to now (2018). Governing indicators: atmospheric conditions and

meteorological variables, forest management information. Evaluation through resilience analysis, deduction of

decision-making guidance for forest management.

Findings:

Annual mortality is an essential indicator of tree vitality. The so-far low mortality rate of beech remained

unchanged up to the end of 2018 despite that year's drought; an indication of the high adaptability of beech to

changing environmental conditions. The C-allocation of beech is a contributing factor. Three impact-indicators are

to be presented, and also C-sinks: fructification, foliation, and diameter increment.

FructificationBeech (in Hesse) fructifies at present at shorter intervals (1988 to 2018 there was a mast every

2.6 years; 1839 to 1987: 4.7 years (Paar et al., 2011), widely synchronised over a number of locations. A significant

reason for this is global radiation. But also influences which can be controlled by forest management (Jandi et al.:

2007, Jarvis, 2005).

Sink properties through growth and interaction In 2018, Beech diameter growth starts above average.

However, growth ends and remains absent from mid of June on water limited sites (Wagner et al. 2019). There is a

connection between diameter increment and weather conditions, as well as interaction with fructification.

Conclusion and Significance:

So far annual beech mortality is low, yet external influences cause alterations in the

C-allocation but without exceeding threshold values of stable sylvan development. More frequent fructification

supports a more natural sylvan development with natural rejuvenation, mixed forest structures and multi-functional

forests (WBGU, 2009; Jarvis, 2005). Taking possible long-term consequences of the extreme summer of 2018 into

account, this positive result for beech must be regarded with a question mark.

Recent Publications

1. Evers, J.;Dammann, I.; König,N.; Paar,U.; Stüber,V.; Schulze,A.; Schmidt,m,.; Schönfelder, E., Eichhorn, J. (2019):

Waldbodenzustandsbericht für Niedersachsen und Bremen. Ergebnisse der zweiten Bodenzustandserhebung

imWald (BZE II). Berichte aus der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Band 19. 498 pp.

2. Wördehoff, R., Spellmann, H.; Evers, J.; Nagel, J. (2011): Kohlenstoffstudie Forst und Holz Niedersachsen.

Beiträge aus der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Band 6 Universitätsverlag Göttingen. 104 pp.

3. Jandi, R.; KLindner, M.; Vesterdal, L.; Bauwens, B.; Baritz, R.; Hagedorn, F.; Johnson, D.; Minkkinen, D.W.;

Byrne, K.; (2007): How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137,

253-268.

4. Jarvis, P.G.; Ibrom, A.; Lindner, S. (2005): Carbon Forestry: managing forests to conserve carbon. In: Griffiths,

Johannes Eichhorn et al., J Earth Sci Clim Change 2019, Volume: 10