Previous Page  3 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Page 25

conferenceseries

.com

September 02-03, 2019 | Berlin, Germany

6

th

World Conference on Climate Change

Volume 10

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change

ISSN: 2157-7617

Climate Change 2019

September 02-03, 2019

Associating Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC) for greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture

of Latvia with carbon sequestration data

Kaspars Naglis-Liepa, Arnis Lenerts, Dina Popluga

and

Dzidra Kreismane

Latvia University of Life Science and Technologies, Latvia

Statement of the Problem:

Environmental preservation is one of the EUmultifaceted policy priorities that influences

all the other policies, among them agricultural (European Commission, 2011). Agriculture plays an essential role

in environmental preservation and in shaping climate policies. The agriculture of Latvia is the second largest source

of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for 24.2% of the total emissions produced in the country (Latvia’s

National Inventory Report, 2017). All the sectors of the economy have to contribute to the reduction of GHG

emissions.

Methodology & Theoretical Orientation:

A popular way how to analyse GHG emission abatement measures is

to use a marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) that ranges the measures according to their costs and emission

reduction potential. The present research focuses on the MACCs designed for Latvia in relation to agricultural

emission reduction measures, which were complemented by two new measures, i.e. “paludi culture crops (reed

(for construction)) on arable land with organic soils” and “establishment of permanent crops (highbush blueberry)

in organic arable land”, that are associated with land use and land use change. Besides, the research analysed 23

measures, revealing their effects on both the agricultural and the LULUCF sectors.

Findings:

The overall conclusion was that the interaction of most of the measures was neutral (12 measures). Only

three measures made positive effects on both sectors, meaning GHG emission reductions in both sectors. The effects

of two measures were unclear, as there was a lack of relevant research investigations. However, a negative interaction

was found for six measures, which was mainly due to the fact that an increase in green biomass produced by the

agricultural sector would result in additional emissions, while the LULUCF sector would increase CO

2

sequestration

because of the increase in green biomass.

Conclusion & Significance:

The research found that some of the measures incorporated in the complemented

MACCs had potential for CO

2

sequestration and C accumulation along with the potential for GHG emission

reduction

Recent Publications

1. Kreismane Dz, Popluga D, Berzina L, Naglis-Liepa K, Lenerts A, Rivza P (2017) Organic farms and agricultural

GHG emissions in Latvia / // Organic Eprints: NJF Report. (NJF Seminar 495). Vol. 13 No. 1 : 4th Organic

conference proceedings "ORGANICS for tomorrow's food systems" p 139-141pp

Kaspars Naglis-Liepa et al., J Earth Sci Clim Change 2019, Volume: 10