Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 26 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 26 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 8, Issue 8(Suppl)

J Cancer Sci Ther

ISSN: 1948-5956 JCST, an open access journal

Page 101

Breast Cancer Congress 2016

September 19-21, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

Breast Cancer

September 19-21, 2016 Phoenix, USA

2

nd

World Congress on

J Cancer Sci Ther 2016, 8:8(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.C1.082

Contrast enhanced digital mammography: Our experience

Bhavika K Patel

Mayo Clinic, USA

C

ontrast Enhanced Digital Mammography is the newest of the contrast enhanced imaging technologies in breast imaging.

CEDM holds great promise to improve breast cancer screening by addressing the potential drawbacks of MRI. CEDM

generates a high-resolution, low-energy, full-field digital mammography image and, similar toMRI, a contrast-enhanced image

that provides lesion vascularity information. The resulting contrast enhanced subtraction images maximize the conspicuity of

iodinated contrast agent in the breast while minimizing the structured noise of non-enhancing fibroglandular tissue, thus

revealing lesions with higher neovascularity and extracellular leakage of contrast agent more apparently. The high spatial

resolution of the digital detector reveals lesion details with approximately ten times the spatial resolution of breast MRI. We

present our clinical experience of over 400 CEDM cases over the past year of diagnostic use. In this presentation we will

demonstrate classic examples of benign and malignant breast cases on CEDM. We will also present general overview of study

results and a brief discussion on how to implement CEDM into the workplace.

Sentinel lymph node detection in breast surgery using ICG vs. 99Tc: A comparison among

different diagnostic protocols

Cattin F, Fogacci T, Frisoni G L, Fabiocchi L, Dellachiesa L, Semprini G

and

Samorani D

Background

: Equivalence in sensibility and specificity between 99Tc and ICG (Indocyanine Green) in sentinel lymph node

detection for breast cancer is nowadays demonstrated. The radioactive medium of contrast needs to be injected a Nuclear

Medicine Department. On the contrary, ICG can be injected directly in the operatory theatre. This implies that, using 99Tc,

patients must undergo two travels instead than the one required using ICG. Aim of our study is to determine the economic

expenses linked to the two possible ways to detect sentinel lymph nodes in breast surgery.

Materials &Methods

: 291 Patients (01/2013-07/2014) of the Breast Unit of the Santarcangelo di Romagna Hospital underwent

both a 99Tc injection and a ICG injection during the validation study of the ICG technique. Patients received 99Tc in the

Nuclear Medicine of the Cesena Hospital (the nearest to the Santarcangelo one). The cost for each kilometer has been calculated

(considering a 0.2788 € refund for kilometer), as well as the carbon footprint (considering a mean CO

2

emission of 118.2 g/

km). 99Tc injection has a cost, all considered, of 1500€ for one patient, and just 100€ are due to the tracer itself. ICG costs 302€

each patient, which become 102€ after the first 250 patients, considering the infrared detecting machine amortization.

Results

: An overall amount of 49778.5Km has been required when using 99Tc, on the contrary IDG has required 18861.7Km.

This implies a carbon footprint of 5.88 tons of CO

2

when using 99Tc and of 2.22 tons of CO

2

when using ICG. The overall

amount of costs of the 99Tc pathway has been 450363.62€. Considering the same patients, the overall cost of the ICG pathway

has been 84883.39€. This means that ICG costs are 18.84% of the 99Tc costs.

Conclusions

: ICG is a safe tracer, as it has a sensibility and specificity equal to the radioactive one. It is cheaper as the traditional

radioactive techniques as well, especially if surgery is performed in peripheric centers or in hospitals which do not own a

Nuclear Medicine Department. Considering our results, we can suggest the use of ICG for the sentinel lymph node detection

in breast surgery, not only as safe technique, but also as cost-effective one.