Previous Page  23 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Page 75

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8, Issue 6 (Suppl)

J Bioremediat Biodegrad, an open access journal

ISSN:2155-6199

Biopolymers & Bioplastics 2017

October 19-20, 2017

October 19-20, 2017 San Francisco, USA

7

th

International Conference and Exhibition on

Biopolymers and Bioplastics

Comparison of polydioxanone and polyhydroxyalkanoate barbed and non-barbed surgical sutures: The

effect of hydrolytic degradation on mechanical and morphological properties

Hui Cong

1

, Martin W. King

1

, Greogry L. Ruff

2

, Simon C. Roe

3

and

Jacqueline H. Cole

4

1

College of Textiles, North Carolina State University, USA

2

55 Vilcom Center, North Carolina, USA

3

College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, USA

4

Joint Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina, USA

Introduction:

Since approved by the US FDA in 2004, barbed surgical sutures have been applied to various fields, such as cosmetic,

orthopedic, urological and other types of surgeries. Polydioxanone (PDO) is a well-studied absorbable suture material. An innovative

biopolymer, poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) manufactured by Tepha Inc. has been converted to various resorbable medical devices,

including sutures. Both polymers are hydrolytically degraded in the body and the byproducts are metabolized and eliminated from

the body without cytotoxic effects. Given the increased surface of barbed sutures, the purpose of the study was to compare the rate of

change in mechanical and morphological properties of the hydrolytically degraded PDO and P4HB barbed and non-barbed sutures.

Methods:

PDO and P4HB barbed sutures were fabricated with a laboratory mechanical cutting machine. Suture segments were

immersed in PBS and stored in an incubator shaker maintained at 37°C. Suture samples were extracted every week for 10 weeks for

measurement of weight, tensile properties and morphology.

Results:

During the 10-week study, the weight loss of PDO suture was 6.5%, while there was no weight loss for the P4HB sutures. The

cutting of barbs on suture’s surface resulted in 42% and 62% strength loss for PDO and P4HB barbed sutures compared with non-

barbed ones. Starting with same level of maximum tensile strength of 30 N, P4HB barbed sutures maintained 66% higher strength

than PDO barbed sutures after 8 weeks and maintained at least 60% strength during 10-week hydrolysis (Figure 1.). SEM images

indicated the integrity of barbs was maintained for both materials during the process of hydrolytic degradation.

Conclusions:

P4HB barbed sutures have a longer degradation profile compared with PDO and significantly higher strength retention.

In addition to the prolonged degradation profile, anchoring performance should be measured first

in vitro

and then

in vivo

to verify

the unique characteristics of P4HB barbed sutures.

hcong@ncsu.edu

J Bioremediat Biodegrad 2017, 8:6 (Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199-C1-012