Previous Page  6 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

Page 55

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8

Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography

Biodiversity Congress 2018

July 26-27, 2018

July 26-27, 2018 Melbourne, Australia

7

th

International Conference on

Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Management

Freshwater fish diversity of north flowing rivers Son and Tons of Uttar Pradesh: Habitat, threats and

conservation prospects

Ajey Kumar Pathak

1

and Uttam Kumar Sarkar

2

1

ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, India

2

ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, India

F

ish diversity, distribution and abundance with environmental parameters from the upstream and downstream parts of two

major north flowing major rivers Son and Tons of Uttar Pradesh were investigated. Overall 61 fish species representing 17

families were collected and Cyprinidae was recorded as the most dominated family represented by 23 species. The threatened

status category of 61 fish species according to the IUCN Red List Criteria 2012 revealed seven species under near threatened,

three species under not evaluated, one under vulnerable (VU) and one under data deficient category. The remaining species

were categorized under least concern. The considerable difference between the relative abundance of fishes of both the rivers

were observed (p<0.05). The abundance and distribution of

Mastacembelus

was recorded highest in the river Tons followed

by

Labeo rohita, Rasbora daniconius

and

Labeo bata

. These species were noticed comparatively lower in the river Son and

abundance of species like

Rita rita, Sperata seenghala, Rasbora daniconius

and

Puntius sophore

were found higher. Further, the

considerable variations between the fish diversity of these rivers were also noticed (p<0.05). Both fish diversity and species

richness showed inverse relationship with respect to altitude. The present study shows that these rivers support considerable

fish diversity with 3.8% vulnerability, which is important for the conservation besides supporting considerable carnivorous

(50-62.5%), omnivores (16.6-29.2%) and herbivores (8.1-16.6%, 3.8-8.3%) species.

pathakajey@rediffmail.com

J Ecosyst Ecogr 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7625-C4-042