Previous Page  11 / 19 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 19 Next Page
Page Background

Page 33

Notes:

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 20

International Journal of Emergency Mental Health & Human Resilience

World Mental Health 2018

July 16-18, 2018

July 16-18, 2018 Dubai, UAE

Public Mental Health and Neuroscience

29

th

International Conference on

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) vs. caffeine: A comparison between their effects on

cognitive functions

Abdulrahman Alammar

Saudi Arabia

Background and Objectives:

Caffeine is well known to increase arousal and alertness, and subsequently, cognitive functions

would increase. Our objective of the present study was to investigate whether anodal Transcranial Direct Current stimulation

(tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex could improve performance cognitive function in comparison with caffeine.

Methodology:

A prospective study was conducted at the College of Medicine, King Saud University during the period between

July and September 2017. A total of 32 subjects performed Cognitrone S4, Reaction Test S3, and Stroop Interference Test S8

in Vienna Test System (WTS NEURO). Tests were designed to assess concentration, attention, reaction, reading speed, and

color recognition. Subjects were categorized into two groups, one group was given tDCS, and the other was given caffeine.

Subjects performed the tasks once with sham tDCS and a placebo (decaf) espresso shot, and once with active tDCS and an

actual espresso shot.

Results:

The number of correct reactions significantly improved in the tDCS group (-4.467±5.012 p=0.004) while in the

caffeine group it did not (-2.294±7.016 p=0.196). On the other hand, the reaction time significantly improved in the caffeine

group (59.294±95.603 p=0.021) while in the tDCS group it did not (14.667±67.248 p=0.413). The overall result showed no

significant difference between tDCS and caffeine on their general cognitive performance.

Conclusion:

This result might be achieved by focally improving executive functions and/or cognitive capacity when tasks are

difficult, rather than by improving levels of arousal/alertness. These results indicate that tDCS is a promising tool to improve

cognitive function. The variability in response to tDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-

invasive brain stimulation. We recommend future studies to explore the effects of tDCS on patients diagnosed with cognitive

disorders.

Biography

Abdulrahman Mohammed Alammar is a medical student at King Saud University. He had completed his education in scientific field at “The Modern Institute of The

Capital”. He got certificates in Basic Course on ECG and Arrhythmias Management, Research Methodology Course at SANS, Radiology Interpretation Course,

Antibiotic and Infection Control Course.

abdulrahman.alammar94@gmail.com

Abdulrahman Alammar, Int J Emerg Ment Health 2018, Volume 20

DOI: 10.4172/1522-4821-C2-014