![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0011.png)
Page 33
Notes:
conferenceseries
.com
Volume 20
International Journal of Emergency Mental Health & Human Resilience
World Mental Health 2018
July 16-18, 2018
July 16-18, 2018 Dubai, UAE
Public Mental Health and Neuroscience
29
th
International Conference on
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) vs. caffeine: A comparison between their effects on
cognitive functions
Abdulrahman Alammar
Saudi Arabia
Background and Objectives:
Caffeine is well known to increase arousal and alertness, and subsequently, cognitive functions
would increase. Our objective of the present study was to investigate whether anodal Transcranial Direct Current stimulation
(tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex could improve performance cognitive function in comparison with caffeine.
Methodology:
A prospective study was conducted at the College of Medicine, King Saud University during the period between
July and September 2017. A total of 32 subjects performed Cognitrone S4, Reaction Test S3, and Stroop Interference Test S8
in Vienna Test System (WTS NEURO). Tests were designed to assess concentration, attention, reaction, reading speed, and
color recognition. Subjects were categorized into two groups, one group was given tDCS, and the other was given caffeine.
Subjects performed the tasks once with sham tDCS and a placebo (decaf) espresso shot, and once with active tDCS and an
actual espresso shot.
Results:
The number of correct reactions significantly improved in the tDCS group (-4.467±5.012 p=0.004) while in the
caffeine group it did not (-2.294±7.016 p=0.196). On the other hand, the reaction time significantly improved in the caffeine
group (59.294±95.603 p=0.021) while in the tDCS group it did not (14.667±67.248 p=0.413). The overall result showed no
significant difference between tDCS and caffeine on their general cognitive performance.
Conclusion:
This result might be achieved by focally improving executive functions and/or cognitive capacity when tasks are
difficult, rather than by improving levels of arousal/alertness. These results indicate that tDCS is a promising tool to improve
cognitive function. The variability in response to tDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-
invasive brain stimulation. We recommend future studies to explore the effects of tDCS on patients diagnosed with cognitive
disorders.
Biography
Abdulrahman Mohammed Alammar is a medical student at King Saud University. He had completed his education in scientific field at “The Modern Institute of The
Capital”. He got certificates in Basic Course on ECG and Arrhythmias Management, Research Methodology Course at SANS, Radiology Interpretation Course,
Antibiotic and Infection Control Course.
abdulrahman.alammar94@gmail.comAbdulrahman Alammar, Int J Emerg Ment Health 2018, Volume 20
DOI: 10.4172/1522-4821-C2-014