Previous Page  17 / 22 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

Page 53

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 08

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education

Public Health Summit 2018

May 24-25, 2018

May 24-25, 2018 Osaka, Japan

4

th

World Congress on

Public Health, Epidemiology & Nutrition

Kyasanur forest disease surveillance system evaluation, Shivamogga, Karnataka and Sindhudurg,

Maharashtra, India – 2016-2017

Ashok Kumar Talyan

1

, Nataraju Seegekote Mariyappa

1

, Pradeep Khasnobis

1

, C S Agarwal

1

, Pavana Murthy

2

, SanketV Kulkarni

1

, Ruchi Jain

1

, Rajesh

Yadav

3

, Ekta Saroha

3

, Samir V Sodha

3,4

, A C Dhariwal

1

and Sujeet Singh

1

1

National Centre for Disease Control, India

2

World Health Organization, India

3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, India

4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA

Background:

Kyasanur forest disease (KFD), transmitted by ticks or contact with infected monkeys, can cause hemorrhagic

fever and death. In India, KFD was first reported from Shivamogga district, Karnataka but recently spread to neighboring

states: Kerala, Goa and Maharashtra. In 2016, there were 411 cases and 11 deaths. We evaluated KFD surveillance through

in Shivamogga, Karnataka and Sindhudurgh, Maharashtra to identify strengths, weaknesses and make recommendations to

prevent spread.

Methods:

We interviewed district health officers and stakeholders from veterinary and forest departments at study sites. We

analyzed April 2016-March 2017 data to evaluate simplicity, timeliness, data quality, representativeness, stability and flexibility.

Results:

KFD is not notifiable but is reported as state-specific disease to the national ‘integrated disease surveillance programme’.

There were 38 KFD cases in Shivamogga and 150 in Sindhudurg during April 2016-March 2017. All 12 (100%) health officers

interviewed in Shivamogga and 11/12 (92%) in Sindhudurg knew case definition. Similarly, 11/12 (92%) officers in Shivamogga

and 10/12 (83%) in Sindhudurg said reporting was easy and simple. Among assessed facilities, only 5 (42%) in Shivamogga and

7 (58%) in Sindhudurg timely submitted weekly reports on Monday. Upon checking data quality; among KFD cases reported

to district, 38/38 (100%) cases data matched health facilities records in Shivamogga and 12/150 (8%) cases data matched

records in Sindhudurg. KFD cases were only reported and represented from government facilities. With respect to stability, in

Shivamogga 11/12 (92%) health facilities had enough reporting forms compared with 9/12 (75%) in Sindhudurg. To achieve

flexibility, three inter-department meetings in Shivamogga and six in Sindhudurg were held in 2016-17 with veterinary and

forest departments.

Conclusions:

KFD surveillance in both districts was simple, stable and flexible but needs improvement for timeliness, data

quality and representativeness. We recommend KFD surveillance (human and animal) training for public and private health

departments, forest and veterinary departments along with inter-department coordination.

ssaqadri@yahoo.com

J Community Med Health Educ 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711-C2-036