Previous Page  22 / 34 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

Page 123

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8

J Community Med Health Educ, an open access journal

ISSN: 2161-0711

Public Health 2018

February 26-28, 2018

PUBLIC HEALTH AND NUTRITION

3

rd

World Congress on

February 26-28, 2018 London, UK

J Community Med Health Educ 2018, Vol 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711-C1-033

MITIGATING RISKS OF STUDENTS USE OF STUDYDRUGS THROUGH UNDERSTANDING

MOTIVATIONS FOR USE AND APPLYING HARM REDUCTION THEORY: A LITERATURE

REVIEW

Dor D Abelman

a

a

Western University School of Health Studies, Canada

A

s postsecondary students’ use of “study drugs” becomes more popular with increasingly reported negative effects on health

and academic performance, failing prohibitionist policies to reduce consumption, and ambiguity in literature towards best

practices to address this population, we present a literature review that seeks effective solutions educational institutions can

apply to improve outcomes for students who use drugs. Motivations for use, effects of the substances, an analysis of efforts to

control use from educational institutions, and suggestions on promoting most effective outcomes based on harm reduction, are

described.Theory, quantitative, and qualitative works from systematic reviews, cohort studies, and epidemiological assessments

are examined on the “study drugs” methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and amphetamine, also known as Adderall, Ritalin,

Focalin, and Concerta. There is a focus on postsecondary students ages 18– 25 in North America. Results show important risk

factors for drug use including low perceived self-¬‐efficacy or enjoyment in courses, poor accommodation of special needs,

reliance on external validation, having a low GPA, and experiencing a mental health issue. There is much misconception on the

health and academic effects of these drugs in literature, among students, and on online knowledge sources. We suggest these

drugs do not improve GPA and learning, while they might temporarily increase memory, but with detrimental negative health

effects. Campaigns that address underlying factors of use can be most successful in mitigating harms.