Previous Page  12 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 7, Issue 10 (Suppl)

Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale), an open access journal

ISSN: 2161-0932

Gynecology 2017

October 02-04, 2017

Page 38

conference

series

.com

4

th

International Conference on

Gynecology & Obstetrics

October 02-04, 2017 Barcelona, Spain

Dianne L Kerr, Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 2017, 7:10(Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0932-C1-021

Acomparison of lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual college women on reproductive health screenings

and sexual behaviors

Statement of the Problem

: Little is known about sexual minority college women regarding reproductive health screenings and

sexual risk behaviors. Research that has been conducted often combines LGBT individuals into one group for analysis, which

may mask the variance between these groups. The Institute of Medicine has recognized the need to separate groups from the

LGBT spectrum in order to more accurately reflect differences. The purpose of this study was to compare lesbian, bisexual, and

heterosexual college undergraduate women on reproductive health screening behaviors and to determine associations between

screening, number of sexual partners, types of sexual intercourse, condom/protective barrier use, and demographic variables.

Methodology & Theoretical Orientation

: The study utilized a pre-existing data set, from the American College Health

Association’s National College Health Assessment. The theoretical orientation was minority stress theory, indicating lesbian

and bisexual women would be more at risk for health debilitating behaviors due to minority stress.

Findings

: Bisexual college women participated more in screenings and were more likely to participate in anal sex than

heterosexual women or lesbians. Bisexuals were less likely to use condoms/protective barriers for vaginal and anal sex in the

last 30 days than heterosexuals. Most of the sample used no barrier protection for oral sex. Lesbians were less likely to have

gynecological exams than bisexual and heterosexual women and to be tested for HIV than bisexual women. Bivariate tests

found significant associations between sexual orientation and each of the preventive screenings. The number of sexual partners

was a significant predictor for all screening tests with those having more partners screening more frequently.

Conclusions & Significance

: Health center personnel should attend to the unique needs of each sexual minority group,

particularly bisexual women who appear to be at higher risk than lesbian or heterosexual women.

Biography

Dianne L Kerr is a Professor of health education and promotion in the School of Health Sciences at Kent State University with a specialization in HIV education and sexual

health. Her passion is advocating for the health of LGBTQ individuals. This began with work at the American School Health Association as AIDS Education Project Director

in some of the most critical years of the AIDS epidemic. She has conducted numerous workshops and presentations on LGBT bullying and transgender health. She is

currently a Provost’s Faculty Associate for diversity equity and inclusion working on policies to benefit LGBTQ students, faculty and staff at the university. She has over 60

publications and has conducted hundreds of presentations. She has won several state and national awards for her work with under-represented populations.

dkerr@kent.edu

Dianne L Kerr

Kent State University, USA