Previous Page  12 / 19 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 19 Next Page
Page Background

Page 51

Digital Pathology & Pathologists 2016

December 05-06, 2016

Volume 6 Issue 5(Suppl)

J Clin Exp Pathol

ISSN: 2161-0681 JCEP, an open access journal

conferenceseries

.com

December 05-06, 2016 Madrid, Spain

9

th

World Digital Pathology & Pathologists Congress

J Clin Exp Pathol 2016, 6:5(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0681.C1.029

Characterizing changes in expression of EMT and metabolic markers during hematogenous

dissemination in breast cancer

Rafael Malagoli Rocha

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

E

pithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and metabolic reprogramming contribute to cancer progression. Here we

investigated changes in expression of EMT and metabolic markers during hematogenous dissemination of breast cancer.

So, we have performed analysis of EMT (CKs and FOXC1) and metabolic (PGC-1a, COXIV and MCT4) markers in CTCs

and tissue samples from naive non-metastatic patients (M0) and metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing therapy (M+).

As results, FOXC1 expression was higher in primary tumors than in their correspondent metastases (p=1.15e

-4

). Primary

tumors of M+ patients had lower expression of CKs compared to primaries of M0 patients. Both EMT markers were less

predominant in CTCs of M+ patients. CTC

FOXC1+

in M+ patients was associated with HER-2+ primary (p=0.004) and T4

tumors (p=0.036). Positivity for markers of oxidative metabolism, PGC-1a and COXIV, was significantly higher in CTCs

from both M0 and M+ groups when compared to MCT4, an aerobic glycolysis marker. M0 patients presenting CTC

MCT4-

and

CTC

PGC1a+/COXIV+

had shorter progression-free survival (p=0.026). In metastasis, PGC-1a expression was increased while MCT4

was decreased, in comparison to correspondent primary tumors. CTC count and expression of EMT markers changed in

CTCs after neoadjuvant therapy while metabolic characteristics were maintained. PGC-1a was the only metabolic marker

that presented positivity in CTCs before and after neoadjuvant treatment. This marker also showed increased expression in

primary tumor post treatment in one patient. Low or no correlation between CTCs and tumors has been observed for all

markers. In this sense, EMT and MET features can be observed in primary tumors and metastasis, respectively and these

phenomena can be subjected to alterations by neoadjuvant treatment. The predominance of oxidative metabolism profile in

CTCs and metastasis in contrast to aerobic glycolysis in primary tumor suggests that cancer cells reprogram their metabolism

from an aerobic glycolysis profile to an oxidative metabolism in order to supply their energetic demand for hematogeneous

dissemination. These events can be modulated by neoadjuvant therapy, pointing out metabolic pathways as potential target

sites. Furthermore, metastasis is the most common cause

of

mortality in cancer patients. Therefore, characterization of

processes that contribute for the dissemination of tumor cells represents an important approach for impairing colonization of

new sites. Here we described changes in expression of EMT and metabolic markers using representative samples of different

stages of breast cancer progression: CTCs, primary tumors and metastases. Our data point out CTCs and targeting metabolic

pathway as additional therapeutic targets in breast cancer as well as the further investigation of HER2 and FOXC1 connections

for understanding and modulation of EMT process in breast cancer.

rafael.malagoli@gmail.com