Previous Page  24 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

conferenceseries LLC Ltd

Notes:

Page 60

Volume 9

Climate Change Summit 2018

Journal of Earth Science & Climate Change | ISSN : 2157-7617

November 19-20, 2018 Paris, France

6

th

Global summit on

Climate Change

Attitude-based behavioral conflict analysis of global environmental governance for climate change

Sharafat Ali, Haiyan Xu

and

Waqas Ahmed

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China

T

here has been a heated debate on the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris accord and its consequences on the global environmental

governance. The back out of second-largest global emitter has been believed to undercut the efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emission

and transition from fossil fuel consumption to renewable energy sources. The pro-environment collective wisdom also believes that

it would also lock the future climate measures. The US exit from the agreement would affect the carbon prices, emission space, and

macroeconomic conditions of the member countries. It is a serious conflicting situation between the member countries especially between

the larger economies in the world. It may affect the mitigation and adaptation efforts to combat global climate change. The present study

is an attempt to design a negotiation strategy to analyze the Global Environmental Governance conflict. Having realized the behaviors of

the decision makers is important in decision-making; this study considers behaviors of the decision makers while analyzing the impact of

attitude(s) of the major players in global environmental decision-making. The alternative strategies of the decision makers are considered

and analyzed. It is traced out how the negative and strong negative attitude of the decision maker(s) leads to adverse outcomes. Moreover,

it is also unveiled how the suitable and acceptable solution could be found if the decision makers have positive/neutral attitude(s) towards

each other. The analysis suggests some equilibrium policy alternatives for the effective leadership in global environmental regime.

J Earth Sci Clim Change 2018, Volume:9

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617-C5-052