Previous Page  13 / 13
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 13
Page Background

Volume 8, Issue 10 (Suppl)

J Earth Sci Clim Change, an open access

ISSN: 2157-7617

Climate Change 2017

October 19-21, 2017

Page 84

Notes:

conference

series

.com

CLIMATE CHANGE

October 19-21, 2017 | Rome, Italy

4

th

World Conference on

Stephen Salter, J Earth Sci Clim Change 2017, 8:10(Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617-C1-035

Can computer models give a win-win result for marine cloud brightening?

T

he best climate modelers are very careful about putting caveats on their results and admit that there are differences about

the polarity let alone magnitude of some of their predictions. However, models are steadily getting better and at present,

they are the only tool we have to study climate problems. Much of the effort to date has been concentrated on the comparisons

between model results rather than finding the best times and seasons to use geoengineering. This is a bit like testing road

vehicles with the steering locked. The broad consensus is that global warming will increase evaporation from the sea and

so increase precipitation. If geoengineering with stratospheric sulphur is used to completely cancel the temperature rises it

will over-correct the precipitation increases and so produce droughts. In contrast, the model predictions for marine cloud

brightening in the troposphere show increases and reductions of precipitation with a trend for reductions in wet places and

increases in dry ones. The strongest reductions are over the sea and one case shows that a small reduction in precipitation

on land is more than offset by lower evaporation. The effects of marine cloud brightening have a higher frequency response

that stratospheric sulphur. It would be very surprising if it produced exactly the same effect through the year in all places so it

follows that intelligent choice of where and when to use it would be better, or at least less bad, than steady, all-year everywhere

spraying. The paper suggests that it may be possible to improve the usefulness of climate models by borrowing an engineering

idea from telecommunications to get an everywhere to everywhere transfer function. The oceans would be divided into a

number of regions. The model settings for the concentration of condensation nuclei in each region would be altered up and

down in each region with different random sequences each of which would be correlated with model predictions round the

world.

Biography

Stephen Salter is emeritus Professor of Engineering Design at the University of Edinburgh.After anApprenticeship in the aircraft industry he worked on a range of problems

including robotics, renewable energy, desalination, oil hydraulics, mine clearance, explosion suppression and voter-friendly traffic-congestion charging.

S.Salter@ed.ac.uk

Stephen Salter

University of Edinburgh, Scotland