Previous Page  7 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

Notes:

Page 28

Climate Change 2016

October 27-29, 2016

Volume 7, Issue 9(Suppl)

J Earth Sci Clim Change

ISSN: 2157-7617 JESCC, an open access journal

conferenceseries

.com

October 24-26, 2016 Valencia, Spain

World Conference on

Climate Change

Integrating the technical and human dimensions of climate change: Communication, culture, conflict

and collaboration

Gregg B Walker

Oregon State University, USA

C

limate policies, such as those featured in the Paris Agreement, are grounded in the arenas of scientific and technical

information. The reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasize, understandably, scientific

and technical aspects of climate change. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) includes

a negotiating group, the subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical Advice (SBSTA) that, as its name states, addresses science

and technology. Climate science serves as the primary driver for climate policy; but climate policy becomes meaningful through

climate practice. Consequently, climate science and climate practice together provide the essential foundation for efficacious

climate policy. And the practices of climate change – the enactment of policies related to all aspects of climate change (e.g.,

mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology, capacity building) rely on human dimensions. The IPCC and UNFCCC have

focused on scientific and technical aspects of climate change, but as climate policy turns to implementation, human dimensions

become increasingly important. This paper focuses on four human dimensions “Cs” of climate change factors that are critical

to enacting sound climate policy in practice. The four factors communication, culture, conflict and collaboration should be

addressed substantially for climate practice to achieve climate policy goals. The paper discussed these four “Cs” and illustrates

their importance through an analysis of one mitigation-related area – REDD+ and one adaptation-related area – loss and

damage. The essay contends that for climate policies to be effective in practice, the scientific/technical and human dimensions

need attention and integration.

Biography

Gregg B Walker is a faculty member in the communication, environmental sciences, forestry, geosciences and public policy programs at Oregon State University. He

teaches courses in conflict management, negotiation, mediation and environmental conflict resolution and science communication. He conducts conflict management

training programs, designs and facilitates public participation processes about environmental policy issues and researches community-level collaboration efforts. He

works with the National Collaboration Cadre of the US Forest Service and the US Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution. He leads climate change project

teams for Mediators beyond Borders and the International Environmental Communication Association and has attended the last seven COPs.

gwalker@oregonstate.edu

Gregg B Walker, J Earth Sci Clim Change 2016, 7:9(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.C1.027