Previous Page  21 / 34 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 4, Issue 4(Suppl)

J Infect Dis Ther 2016

ISSN: 2332-0877, JIDT an open access journal

Page 58

Notes:

Infectious Diseases 2016

August 24-26, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

August 24-26, 2016 Philadelphia, USA

&

Infectious Diseases

Joint Event on

2

nd

World Congress on

Pediatric Care & Pediatric Infectious Diseases

International Conference on

Multiple regulatory small RNAs control virulence in enteropathogenic

Escherichia coli

Shantanu Bhatt, Marisa Egan, Valerie Jenkins, Thomas Buerkert, Jasmine Ramirez, Christian Xander, Jamie Palmer

and

Elizabeth Storm

Saint Joseph’s University, USA

E

nteropathogenic

Escherichia coli

(EPEC) is responsible for considerable disease and death amongst infants in developing countries.

EPEC belongs to the attaching and effacing (A/E) family of bacterial pathogens, which are aptly named because they adhere

intimately to intestinal cells and destroy cellular microvilli to form characteristic pathomorphological A/E lesions, which lead to

diarrhea and dehydration. The ability to form A/E lesions resides within the virulence module locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE),

which encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS). To date, over fifty non-LEE encoded regulators have been identified in EPEC. The

vast majority of these regulators affect the expression of the LEE-encoded transcription factors, Ler, GrlR and GrlA. Intriguingly,

every regulator of the LEE that has been identified to date in EPEC is a proteinaceous factor. Thus far, not a single regulatory small

RNA (sRNA) has been implicated in its virulence. We set out to identify and characterize sRNA regulators of the LEE in EPEC. Our

preliminary data suggest that Hfq globally represses gene expression from all the LEE-encoded genes including the

grlRA

operon.

Because Hfq and Hfq-dependent sRNAs typically target the 5’ region of the first gene in an operon, we constructed a reporter

E. coli

strain in which only the 5’ UTR and 45 nucleotides of the

grlR

ORF were fused to a chromosomal N-terminally truncated

lacZ

gene

driven by the heterologous

P

araBAD

promoter (

P

araBAD

-grlR-lacZ

). Inactivation of

hfq

resulted in elevated β-galactosidase activity from

the

grlR’-‘lacZ

fusion suggesting that the cloned 5’ region of

grlR

was sufficient to elicit Hfq-dependent repression. These results also

suggest that one or more Hfq-dependent sRNAs, conserved between EPEC and

E. coli

, regulate

grlRA

. To identify these sRNAs, each

of the 27 conserved Hfq-dependent sRNAs was individually overproduced in the

grlR-lacZ

reporter strain. Three sRNAs-MgrR, RyhB

and McaS reproducibly repressed the

grlR-lacZ

fusion. Using IntaRNA we aligned each of the 3 sRNAs to the cloned 5’ region of

grlR

.

Bioinformatic analysis revealed that MgrR exhibited the most extensive and contiguous region of complementarity (~10 bp) with

the

grlR

leader region. The predicted base-pairing region in MgrR was substituted with a scrambled oligonucleotide sequence that

lacks complementarity to

grlR

. Predictably, mutation of the base-pairing region abolished the ability of MgrR to pair to and repress

the

grlR-lacZ

fusion, thereby providing genetic evidence for direct base-pairing between

grlR

and MgrR. Subsequent experiments

revealed that MgrR binds to the same region on the

grlR

A transcript as CsrA and counteracts its stimulatory effect. Meanwhile,

RyhB appeared to form a relatively shorter (~6 bp) duplex with the ribosome-binding site of

grlR

. An oligonucleotide substitution

in the base-pairing region of RyhB also prevented the sRNA from repressing the

grlR-lacZ

fusion, suggesting that RyhB, like MgrR,

base pairs to the 5’ region of

grlR

. In contrast to MgrR and RyhB, McaS did not possess any regions of complementarity to

grlR

and

presumably exerts its effect by sequestering CsrA. In summary, our results provide the first piece of evidence to implicate multiple

Hfq-dependent sRNAs in controlling the LEE-encoded virulence of EPEC. Future studies are aimed at elucidating the molecular

mechanism by which MgrR, RyhB and McaS regulate the LEE and the ensuing A/E lesion formation.

Biography

Shantanu Bhatt is affiliated to Saint Joseph’s University, USA

sbhatt@sju.edu

Shantanu Bhatt et al., J Infect Dis Ther 2016, 4:4(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2332-0877.C1.008