Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
The global obesity epidemic has been on the rise for the last four decades. Whilst energy gap models quantified the relationship
between energy intake and expenditure, new research suggests that that there is one unstable element in the equation: the human
being ( Maha et al., 2013; Swinburn 2001; Gortmaker 2011). It has been postulated that, if humans are left to their own devices,
they fail to self-regulate their eating habits (Cooper and Kovacic, 2012). The Nudge concept, advocated by the UK Government and
policy-makers seems an elegant almost too easy way to overcome failures in public health policy through behavior change. The aim
of the project was to attempt to 1) explore Nudge Theory 2) investigate the political power motives and challenges and finally to 3)
ascertain the role of Nudge Theory in UK obesity policy. Desk-based critical enquiry (rooted in critical theory) analysis method
was used to explore the theoretical and conceptual connections between the State, power and practical- rhetorical shift currently
occurring in obesity policy. It has been concluded that Nudge, embedded in neoliberal paternalism, managed through health system
reorganization might not be the final answer to obesity epidemic. It is paramount, that behavioral interventions utilizing Nudge
Theory (and including other behavioral economic models) needs to be clearly defined and should complement other public health
interventions. Nudge concept should not be uniform ΓΆΒ?Β? and not treated as one size fits all.