Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Background: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) causes debilitating malnutrition and leads to deterioration of the
immune response. However, the concept of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is controversial when applied to
patients with AGC.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the PNI after gastrectomy in patients with AGC.
Materials & Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using propensity score matching (PSM) in
gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection via laparoscopic or open surgery between 2014 and 2017.
To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 matching using five covariates.
Results: The resection margins (P<0.001) and LNM (P=0.004) were significantly different between the two groups. In
univariate analysis, poor tumor differentiation (P=0.038) (R1+R2, P=0.004), vascular and neural invasion (P<0.001),
and a PNI<50 (P<0.001) were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). In multivariate analysis, a
PNI<50 (Hazard ratio (HR), 12.993; P<0.001) was a risk factor for RFS. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS)
revealed that a PNI<50 (P<0.001) (R1+R2, P=0.006) and vascular and neural invasion (P<0.001) were risk factors.
In subsequent multivariate analysis, a PNI<50 (HR, 24.501; P<0.001) was a significant risk factor for OS. Clinical
assessments performed during a 12.34 (±5.050) month follow-up revealed that OS (P<0.001) and RFS (P<0.001)
were worse in patients with a low PNI (<50) than in matched patients with a high PNI.
Conclusion: A low PNI is a strong predictor of unfavorable RFS and OS in patients with AGC.