Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
This paper provides a critical evaluation of a real world project involving the review and subsequent development of a new
Code of Conduct for the world?s largest health and safety body, the Institution of Occupational Safety Health (IOSH,
2011). The project was conducted as action research and was divided into 4 cycles or stages. Stage 1 involved the critical review
and benchmarking of the existing code against other codes using an adaptation of the Professional Associations Research
Network (PARN) criteria. Stage 2 involved the consultation process for the development of a new code. This included the
researcher?s role as leader of the project and an evaluation of misconduct cases reviewed by the PC. Stage 3 involved semistructured
interviews of practitioners to explore experiential accounts of ethical issues from practice to inform the guidance
on the code. Finally, stage 4 involved the concluding consultation and consolidation of all the stages for presentation of the
revised code to IOSH council for approval. The outcome of the project has been positively received by IOSH. A new code was
produced with guidance and a revised disciplinary procedure that is fit for purpose and adaptable to change through the use of
robust development and broad consultation processes. It is anticipated that these changes will make a significant contribution
to the wider profession and practice. An ethical decision making model was developed from the findings and included a
dissemination strategy.
Biography
Shaun Lundy has over 25 years experience as both an academic and practitioner in the field of health and safety. He is currently the Academic Portfolio Leader
for BSc and MSc programs in Safety, Health, and Environment at the University of Greenwich. He currently sits on the Health and Safety Executives Myth Busters
Challenge Panel set up by the UK Government to scrutinize dubious health and safety decisions in the public interest. He is also the technical editor for Agora
business publications, the Health and Safety Advisor and Health and Safety in Schools and Colleges. He has a keen interest in education, competence and ethics
in relation to health and safety practice.
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals