ISSN: 2161-0711

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Practice patterns in neuromuscular blockade monitoring

Joint Event on Public Health, Womens Health, Nursing and Hospital Management

Darryl DuVall

Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Childrens Hospital Spokane, USA

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Community Med Health Educ

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711-C7-051

Abstract
This study aimed to provide accurate estimates of rates of qualitative neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring during surgical procedures utilizing NMB agents. Residual neuromuscular blockade in patients admitted to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) is common, with inadequate postoperative neuromuscular block reversal event rates ranging from 16% to 70%. NMB monitoring is effective in detecting residual NMB, yet research fi ndings suggest that in patients whom have had NMB agents administered, up to 40% do not receive intraoperative NMB monitoring. Anesthesia practice guidelines suggest performance of NMB monitoring when a NMB agent is administered. Despite best practice guidelines recommending NMB monitoring, estimates of the rate of NMB monitoring are dated and low. In our study, the estimated overall rate of NMB monitoring was 98.9%. No statistically signifi cant differences in NMB monitoring rates were found for surgery year, provider type (MD/DO or CRNA), patient BMI, patient age, or length of surgery. There were a disproportionate number of females that had NMB monitoring performed compared to males (p=0.002). Additionally, there were a disproportionate number of patients aged 40-69 and 70-80+ that had NMB monitoring performed compared to patients aged 18-39 (p=0.01). Several variables were included in the fi nal logistic regression model as signifi cant predictors of the lack of NMB monitoring. A Delphi panel recommended future research examining adverse respiratory events in the PACU to establish a standard of care for quantitative versus qualitative NMB monitoring in the perioperative period
Biography

E-mail: darryl.duvall@wsu.edu

 

Relevant Topics
Top