Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Recommended Conferences
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1131

Journal of Pain & Relief received 1131 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Pain & Relief peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Cosmos IF
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Percutaneous intradiscal interventions

International Conference and Exhibition on Pain Medicine

Farnad Imani

Posters-Accepted Abstracts: J Pain Relief

DOI: 10.4172/2167-0846.S1.003

Abstract
Discogenic low back pain resulting from internal disc disruption can be severely disabling, clinically challenging, and expensive to treat. Previously, when conservative care had been exhausted, open surgical interventions such as spinal fusion or artificial disc replacement was the only treatment option for these patients. Early percutaneous procedures showed conclusively that these interventions effectively relieve pain for appropriate patients, but had some limitations, and so over the years a variety of more advanced techniques have been developed. Fluoroscopic guided percutaneous intradiscal procedures such as disc decompression, nucleotomy, intra-discal electro thermal therapy (IDET), nucleoplasty, intradiscal radiofrequency (RF), and biaculoplasty are interventionally and minimally-invasive techniques performed in the outpatient setting, offers an intermediate intervention between conservative care and surgery. For appropriately selected patients, these percutaneous interventions can help relieve back and leg pain symptoms, including sciatica and radiculopathy and even pure axial pain caused by a central focal protrusion or central bulge of the disc. This group of patients has failed conservative therapy consisting of a trial of simple analgesics, NSAIDs, bed rest, and epidural steroids. Some pain specialists also recommend that a trial of transforaminal epidural steroid nerve blocks should be attempted before these percutaneous intradiscal interventions. To optimize patient selection, the ideal candidate for these procedures should have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diskography, and electromyographic (EMG) changes that correlate with the patient?s radicular pain pattern. During all these procedures, an instrument is introduced under fluoroscopic guidance through a needle and placed into the center of the disc where a series of channels are created to remove tissue from the nucleus or to shrinkage it. Both tissue removal from the nucleus and volume reduction of nucleus act to decompress the disc and relieve the pressure exerted by the disc on the nearby nerve root. As pressure is relieved, pain is reduced, consistent with the clinical results of earlier percutaneous intradiscal interventions. There is little tissue trauma and recovery times may be improved in many patients. Complications of percutaneous intradiscal interventions directly related to using the device are generally self-limited.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Top