Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Outcome of different types of osteotomies in Primary and revision rhinoplasty

2nd International Conference and Exhibition on Rhinology and Otology

Waed Jameel, Mohamed Saad Eldin Aly, Noran Sultan, Moath Alshanqity and Lamees Felemban

ScientificTracks Abstracts: Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale)

DOI: 10.4172/2161-119X.S1.007

Abstract
Objective: Rhinoplasty enhances facial harmony and the proportions of the nose. The ultimate goal of our research is to see the variation between two techniques of lateral osteotomies: low-to-low and low-to-high to weight out the advantages and disadvantages together with the patient fulfillment. Methods: It?s a retrospective cohort study containing 104 patients, all above 18 year old that had undergone rhinoplasty surgery with two different technique of lateral osteotomy. 70 patients where low-to-low along with 34 patients were low-to-high. All 104 patients had some sort of nasal deformity. Our research compared the ventral width, patient satisfaction in breathing as well as aesthetic pre and post-operatively. Results: As the statistical analysis showed the aesthetic calculations showed a significant variation in the results either from the patient satisfaction or the ventral width measurement with a P<.0001. 95.7% of the low-to-low group reached an ideal ventral width according to the Arabic nose values in contrast to the low-to-high group showed only 52.9%. Unlike the breathing result were unremarkable postoperatively P<.78. Conclusion: The aesthetic view of low-to-low group results showed a statistical significant difference almost reached the ideal measurements P<.0001. In the other hand Patient satisfaction in breathing and Quality of life improved in both groups equally.
Biography
Top