ISSN: 2161-0711

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Nurses clinical judgment in palliative care

6th World Congress on Community Nursing

Mahvash Salsali, Seidi J and Alhani F

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences, Iran Tarbiat Modares University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Community Med Health

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711.C1.022

Abstract
Nurses��? clinical judgments and decisions have the potential to help health care systems distribute resources efficiently, prevent harm, and promote health achievement and patient benefit. The core characteristics or competencies of nurses included are: clinical judgment, advocacy and ethics, collaboration, professionalism, communication, cultural components, as well as facilitation of learning. Clinical judgment is one of the key attributes of professional practice. It is a prerequisite for establishing professional identity and is mainly based on nurses��? knowledge and experience as well as their reasoning, intuition, clinical thinking, and evidence-based practice skills. Evidence from healthcare systems around the world suggests that judgments made by nurses could be improved and we need to know more about nurses��? judgments, the interventions likely to improve their decisions, and outcomes. In this qualitative study we aimed to explore the process of Iranian nurses��? professionalization in clinical judgment. The data were collected based on semi-structured interviews and the study included 24 participants. Data analysis was carried out concurrently with data collection using the grounded theory method. The study findings revealed that the participants employed different strategies for becoming professional in clinical judgment development. These strategies constituted the core category of the study, which was ��?struggling for becoming professional in clinical judgment��?. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previous studies had explored the process of professionalization in clinical judgment. However, several studies have reported some of the properties and strategies of professionalization in clinical judgment. The findings provided critical information about nurses��? professionalization in clinical judgment. Accordingly, the participants adopted different strategies to develop their clinical judgment ability. Integrating these strategies into nursing theory and clinical education can improve nurses��? clinical judgment ability especially in the field of palliative care.
Biography

Email: m_salsali@hotmail.com

Relevant Topics
Top