Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Non-significant results: Do your groups really come from the same population?

Global Physiotherapy Congress

Raymond Chong

Augusta University, USA

Keynote: J Nov Physiother

DOI: 10.4172/2165-7025.C1.010

Abstract
How many times have you stopped looking at your data after your statistical analysis reveals a non-significant outcome? Do you file the study away and not publish your work? Or do you report the results and attempt to rationalize why it happened? Sometimes, if the result is not what you expect, your intuition may be right. Here I will provide an example of how an initial statistical analysis can be followed-up with additional analyses to determine whether your data really comes from the same population as implied by the non-significant result.
Biography

Raymond Chong completed his PhD in 1997 from University of Oregon. He is the Director of Augusta University's Human Movement Science Lab. He is a lead Author in over 70% of his papers. In addition to serving as Executive Editor of the Journal of Novel Physiotherapies, he also serves on the editorial board of other journals including Gait & Posture.

Email: RCHONG@augusta.edu

Relevant Topics
Top