Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 2854
Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography received 2854 citations as per Google Scholar report
Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
- CAS Source Index (CASSI)
- Index Copernicus
- Google Scholar
- Sherpa Romeo
- Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
- Open J Gate
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
- Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
- Electronic Journals Library
- RefSeek
- Hamdard University
- EBSCO A-Z
- OCLC- WorldCat
- SWB online catalog
- Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
- Publons
- Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
- Euro Pub
Useful Links
Recommended Journals
Share This Page
Mitigating impacts of projects on biodiversity conservation in Uganda
6th International Conference on Biodiversity and Conservation
Fred R Muwanika, F Mwaura, F Ogwal, M Masiga, M Akullo and T O Okurut
National Environmental Management Authority, Uganda
Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Ecosyst Ecogr
Abstract
Introduction: This study provides light on the impact of implemented projects on biodiversity in Uganda in terms of harmful and enhancing projects. Biodiversity harmful projects are defined as the type of projects that destroy or lead to biodiversity loss during their implementation, while biodiversity enhancing projects are those that lead to biological diversity during their implementation. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of implemented projects in the communities on biodiversity conservation and management in Uganda. Methods: The data used in this analysis was obtained from Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) previously collected during the National Service Delivery Survey (NSDS 2008). Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to derive the different impact dimensions of projects on biodiversity among the communities in Uganda. Results: Implemented projects in the communities impact biodiversity both positively and negatively. Findings revealed that livestock improvement/restocking/breeding contribute about 30% on the biodiversity positive impacts, while introduction of improved crop variety at about 20% and agricultural technology at about 11.4%. Furthermore, construction of new road/bridges are the leading projects in destroying biodiversity accounting for about 13.5% of the variation in negative impacts, while construction of toilet/ latrines and health units accounts for 11.8% and 9.4% respectively of the variation in biodiversity loss. Conclusions & Recommendations: Construction related projects impact negatively on biodiversity in their implementation, while agricultural related projects are the leading agro-biodiversity enhancing projects in Uganda. This implies that work sectors must play an important role in biodiversity conservation in Uganda. Secondly, construction and agriculture related projects should endeavour to allocate a percentage of the project budget equivalent to expected impact on biodiversity towards its management and restoration.Biography
Email: frmuwanika@yahoo.co.uk
