Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Statement of the Problem: Acute necrotic pancreatitis (ANP) remains complicated problem of urgent surgery because
of high frequency of systemic, purulent and septic complications, mortality rate, which is in patients with infected
pancreonecrosis 14.7-26.4%.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficiency and establish indications for minimally invasive methods of
treatment of post-necrotic pseudocyst of pancreas.
Methodology & Theoretical Orientation: For diagnostics ultrasonography was used, diagnostic laparoscopy, helical CT
with contrast strengthening. Endoscopic interventions were applied by duodenoscopes “Olympus” under control of X-ray
machine “Siemens BV 300”. Cystodigestive fistulas were created by prickly papilotoms. For providing of long passability
of cystodigestive fistula were used two endoprostheses like “pig tail” sized 10 Ft with length 5-6 cm. For transpapillary
drainage were used pancreatic endoprostheses like “pig tail”, sized 5-7 Ft with length 5 cm.
Findings: In 82 (68.2%) patients were applied minimally invasive methods of treatment; Percutaneous external drainage
in 38 (46.3 %) patients, endoscopic transmural drainage of post-necrotic pseudocyst in 22 (26.85%) patients. Combined
endoscopic interventions were applied in 22 (26.85%) patients. In particular, endoscopic transmural drainage with
temporary stenting of pancreatic duct in 11 (50%) patients, endobiliary stenting with temporary stenting of pancreatic
duct in 5 (22.7%) patients, temporary stenting of pancreatic duct in 4 (18.2%) patients, endoscopic transmural drainage
with percutaneous external drainage in 2 (9.1%) patient.
Conclusion & Significance: Usage of combined minimally invasive methods of treatment of acute necrotic pancreatitis
complicated by post-necrotic pseudocyst help to improve results of treatment, reduction of complications amount,
contraction of stationary treatment terms and improving of life quality.
Recent Publications
1. Madacsy L, Kurucsai G and Joo I (2009) Rescue ERCP and insertion of small-calibre pancreatic stent to prevent
the evolution of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis: a case-controlled series. Surg. Endosc. 23(8):1887-93.
2. Harewood G, Pochron N and Gostout C (2005) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic
pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest. Endosc.
62(3):367-70.
3. Bakker O, van Santvoort H and van Brunsshot S (2012) Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for
infected necrotizing pancreatitis: randomized trial. J.A.M.A., 307(10):1053-61.
4. Banks P, Bollen T and Dervenis C (2012) Classification of acute pancreatitis 2012-revision of the Atlanta
classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 62(1):102-11.
5. Lau S, Simchuk E and Kozarek R (2001) A pancreatic ductal leak should be sought to direct treatment in patients
with acute pancreatitis. American Journal of Surgery, 181(5):411-5
Biography
Nazar Omelchuk works as an Abdominal Surgeon at Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Hospital and at Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University. He is pursuing his PhD about minimally-invasive methods of acute pancreatic post-necrotic pseudocyst treatment. He has three registered patents about new ways of acute pancreatic post-necrotic pseudocyst treatment.