Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 5125

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change received 5125 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • SWB online catalog
  • Publons
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Impacts of climate model parametric uncertainty in an MPC implementation of the DICE integrated assessment model

5th World Conference on Climate Change and Global Warming

Salman Hafeez, Steven R Weller and Christopher M Kellett

University of Newcastle, Australia University of Essex, UK

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Earth Sci Clim Change

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617-C1-040

Abstract
Integrated assessment models (IAMs) are a key tool in studying the interdependence of the global economy and the climate system. For example, the dollar value of carbon dioxide emissions due to anthropogenic climate damages, known as the social cost of carbon (SCC), can be computed using the widely used DICE (Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and the Economy) IAM by solving an open-loop optimal control problem. The results of such an open-loop decision-making strategy, however, do not fully reflect the impacts of uncertainty in the dynamic response of the global climatic system to radiative forcing. An implementation of the DICE IAM based on model predictive control (MPC) is proposed. This MPC-based approach draws a clear distinction between the climate model used by DICE for mitigation planning purposes, and the ΓΆΒ?Β?true" global climate captured by a low-order emulation of a model drawn from a state-of-the-art climate model ensemble (CMIP5, the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project). The closed-loop control methodology quantifies the impact of parametric climate model uncertainty (plant-model mismatch). c3197107@uon.edu.au
Biography
Relevant Topics
Top