Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Introduction: Glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN) blocking is an interventional technique that has occasionally been used for
the palliative treatment of pain due to head-neck malignancies and glossopharyngeal neuralgia (1). In clinical practice, GPN
blocking was first used as an aid for awake endotracheal intubation in the late 1950s (2). In 1910, Wisenburg (2) identified
pain in the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve in a patient with a cerebellopontine angle tumor. In 1921, Harris (2)
reported the first idiopathic case and coined the term glossopharyngeal neuralgia. However, there are very few articles and case
presentations on GPN blocking. Therefore, we present a patient with cancer of the tongue base who underwent bilateral GPN
neurolysis using alcohol.
Case Report: One month earlier, a 38-year-old male was hospitiziled cause of tongue root cancer required a tracheostomy
and gastrostomy following obstruction of the respiratory tract. He had limited mouth opening and developed severe painful
paresthesias, with throbbing at the tongue base, intraorally, and in the throat. Medically, he was treated with pregabalin 300
mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day, tramadol 400 mg/day, paracetamol 4 g/day, dexketoprofen trometamol 100 mg/day, and 100
μg/hr fentanyl patches. No local infection, changes in vital signs, or coagulopathy were observed. We decided to perform a
prognostic GPN block. In the operating room, the patient was laid on his left side, monitored, and given sedoanalgesia. The
mid-point of an imaginary line from the mastoid process to the edge of the left mandible was located. The skin was cleaned
with antiseptic solution and a 10 cm 22G spinal needle was inserted perpendicularly to the skin until it touched the styloid
bone at a depth of approximately 3.5 cm. Then it was withdrawn slightly and directed posteriorly. The loss of bone contact
was confirmed with fluoroscopy. The next day, the patient reported a VAS score of 5 for his pain. Therefore, using the same
technique, in the place where diagnostic block was 4 mL 50% alcohol was injected into the right and left sides . On account of
the fact that it is a neurolytic block we waited for 20 minutes before bilateral injection. Weakness of the left trapezius muscle
was observed caused by N.accesorius blocage. No tachycardia, infection, ecchymosis, or hematoma developed.
Conclusion: A GPN block must be performed with care, because the vagus, hypoglossa and accessorius nerves are very close
to the GPN . Therefore, any GPN block must be performed by an experienced anesthesia and pain specialist because of the
nerves , major veins (retromandibular vein and posterior auricular vein that forming the internal jugular vein) and arterial
structures (internal carotid artery and its branchs ) in the region. Lijewski (3) reported that upper airway obstruction was the
most common complication after using GPN blocks to control pain after pediatric tonsillectomies because of unintentional
blockade of the hypoglossal nerve, which is very near the GPN in the lateral pharyngeal region. There is no structure in this
region to limit the spread of the anesthetic. A GPN block can cause secondary hypertension with tachycardia and an obstructed
upper airway if the nearby vagus and hypoglossal nerves are blocked by mistake (3). We observed weakness of the left trapezius
as a potential complication of GPN block caused by N.accesorius blocage , but no other complications.In summary a GPN
block can decrease cancer pain due to invase tumors of the tongue= base,hypopharynx and tonsils that cannot be controlled
medically.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals