Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Recommended Conferences
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1131

Journal of Pain & Relief received 1131 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Pain & Relief peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Cosmos IF
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Functional restoration? Evidence-based practice?

International Conference and Exhibition on Pain Medicine

Jenny Ralls

Posters-Accepted Abstracts: J Pain Relief

DOI: 10.4172/2167-0846.S1.003

Abstract
Chronic and episodic pain disorders are inherently difficult to deal with and often the people living with them get spat out at the end of a system having watched their levels of function at work, home, and socially drop through the floor. Problems which start as relatively simple musculoskeletal disorders can quickly spiral into long term disability, reduced participation and breakdown of family life, and associated mental health disorders. Functional Restoration Programmes are designed to tackle these multi-faceted issues in a practical way, through the inclusion of Cognitive Behavioural techniques, education, general fitness and work hardening. However, they have become a contentious intervention; whilst thousands of people and businesses find them beneficial in restoring fitness for work and life a recent systematic review questioned its efficacy. They are, after all, relatively costly and time intensive, so require a substantial investment from the fee payer. This review will look at what Functional Restoration Programmes are (and what they aren?t), where the discrepancies arise, and where these interventions fit into the clinical picture. It will address issues of expected outcomes and return on investment (based on an occupational health model), and argue that they have an important role in the clinical pathway. The practical elements of inclusion and exclusion criteria will be covered as crucial factors to success, plus an overview of separate components. The importance of outcome measures and options for these will be covered briefly and outcome measure options will be presented. Lastly we will discuss what the future of these programmes might hold.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Top