Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Recommended Conferences
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1556

Journal of Pain & Relief received 1556 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Pain & Relief peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Cosmos IF
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Effects of motor-control training on people suffering from back pain-A comparison individual vs. group intervention

2nd International Conference and Exhibition on Pain Medicine

H Streicher and F Matzold

University of Leipzig, Germany

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Pain Relief

DOI: 10.4172/2167-0846.C1.009

Abstract
Back pain is an epidemiological problem of our modern time. In view of the enormous costs, which it causes for the health system, the question of evaluated, effective and efficient treatments rises. Results of numerous investigations indicate that MCT can be considered to be particularly effective in terms of promoting motor-control parameters of lumbar spine and pelviabdominal regions. Due to training related neuromuscular adaptations sustainable effects can be achieved. The purpose of this investigation was to figure out whether â??motor-control trainingâ? (MCT) implemented within a group intervention (experimental group, N=18, age M= 45.2; SD=18.4) is able to reach similar results as a conventional individual intervention (comparison group, (N=13; age=56.6; SD=18.5). In order to analyze these effects a training experiment has been used. In the context of this investigation people suffering from recurring low back pain were considered. To capture both groupsâ?? progress the anterolateral abdominal muscle recruitment has been measured by the use of ultrasound imaging according to Whittaker (2007). Furthermore, the correlation between pain relief and development of muscle recruitment has been evaluated. Both forms of intervention produced significant improvements regarding abdominal muscle control and pain situation. Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences between individual and group interventions, which indicate that under comparable effort group application can be considered as more efficient.
Biography

H Streicher has completed her PhD from University of Leipzig. She is Research Associate at the University of Leipzig (Faculty of Sport Science, Institute of Exercise and Public Health). She has published more than 10 papers in journals.

Email: hstreich@server1.rz.uni-leipzig.de

Relevant Topics
Top