Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

DOES CO-PAYMENT BY CONSUMERS AFFECT ADHERENCE TO, AND OUTCOMES OF, PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT?

6th International Conference on EPIDEMIOLOGY & PUBLIC HEALTH

Bridget Bassilios, Jane Pirkis, Meredith Harris and Harvey Whiteford

University of Melbourne, Australia University of Queensland, Australia

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)

DOI: 10.4172/2161-1165-C1-018

Abstract
Statement of the Problem: It is well known that many people who have mental health care needs do not receive mental health services. There is evidence to suggest that multiple socio-demographic (e.g., age, sex, socio-economic disparity) and clinical characteristics (e.g., type, severity and comorbidity of mental disorder) are associated with mental health service use. Partial and full fee-for-service by consumers is among the socio-economic disparity factors that may influence utilisation of mental health services but has not been widely studied, with existing research producing inconsistent findings. This study aims to determine whether partial fee-for-service (�co-payment�) by consumers affects their adherence to, and outcomes of, psychological treatment delivered via a major Australian primary mental healthcare initiative � the Access to Allied Psychological (ATAPS) Services program. Methodology: We will use routinely-collected data from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016 (representing approximately 700,000 scheduled sessions and 140,000 episodes of care) sourced from the ATAPS minimum dataset to determine whether co-payment and other socio-demographic and clinical characteristics predict these outcomes. Significance: Improving our understanding of factors that may improve access to, and outcomes from, psychological treatment is policy-relevant and has direct implications on primary mental health service delivery.
Biography
Top