ISSN: 2161-0681

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1437

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology received 1437 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • Cosmos IF
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • RefSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
  • world cat
  • journal seek genamics
  • j-gate
  • esji (eurasian scientific journal index)
Share This Page

Application of digital pathology systems for biomarker analysis in translational pathology: Challenges and caveats for the pathologist

4th International Conference and Exhibition on Pathology

Jaime Rodriguez-Canales

Posters-Accepted Abstracts: J Clin Exp Pathol

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0681.S1.017

Abstract
An important aim in translational pathology is the discovery of novel biomarkers in human tissue samples, especially those with predictive value. A traditional method for biomarker analysis is based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections which is then evaluated with light microscopy by a pathologist, who usually provides a semi quantitative scoring. However, this method is subjective and effort consuming, including also a variability between observers. The current development of digital pathology systems, including faster scanners and more powerful image analysis software, provide an important tool for biomarker evaluation. However, the application of image analysis technologies requires a higher quality and consistency of IHC. Furthermore, in our experience we have learned that the application of digital pathology demands a new role for the pathologist who has now to provide a more rigorous IHC quality control, including the selection of markers for image analysis depending on their expression pattern, and also and type of image analysis technique available for a particular project, in order to provide reliable and useful data with translational meaning.
Biography
Top