Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
In the late 1960s Vaughan Williams introduced a novel classification of antiarrhythmic drugs. This scheme since has
been widely used around the world and has prompted the development of new drugs with major clinical impact.
Yet fifty years later, arrhythmic diseases still remain a major public health issue. Both scientific investigation and
clinical practice directed at these fall behind advances in other cardiac and medical areas. These problems together
have resulted in a lack of comprehensive yet clear conceptual classification of identified targets and their relationship
to each of the wide range of known arrhythmic mechanisms. Repeated attempts, including that by a working group
of the European Society of Cardiology in 1991 at such a clarification met only limited success.
Our recent focus article published in Circulation (2018;138:1879–1896) now bridges these conceptual gaps and
culminates in a modernized drug classification collating findings made over the subsequent five decades. These
compiled and organized studies of different molecular drug targets, their action mechanisms, and consequent
clinical effects, areas in which the authors have themselves contributed, whether as experimentalists or clinicians. It
augments Vaughan Williams’s original framework covering the actions of sodium, potassium and calcium ions and
autonomic nervous effects on these (Class I-IV). The novel categories introduced now bear on altered heart rates
(Class 0), mechanical stretch (Class V); intercellular electrical communication (Class IV) and longer term structural
change (Class VII). The scheme also proceeds to draw attention to multiple drug targets and actions and possible
adverse, even pro-arrhythmic, effects.
This revised Oxford classification will therefore clarify a rational clinical use of existing available anti-arrhythmic
drugs in relationship to their particular mechanisms of action. It will aid identification and development of novel drugs
relating their future clinical applications to their molecular mechanisms of action.
Supported by BHF, Wellcome Trust and MRC
Biography
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals