Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 2091
Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System received 2091 citations as per Google Scholar report
Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
- Index Copernicus
- Google Scholar
- Sherpa Romeo
- Open J Gate
- Genamics JournalSeek
- China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
- Electronic Journals Library
- RefSeek
- Hamdard University
- EBSCO A-Z
- OCLC- WorldCat
- SWB online catalog
- Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
- Publons
- Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
- Euro Pub
- ICMJE
Useful Links
Recommended Journals
Related Subjects
Share This Page
Acute non trauma gastric perforation: Operative vs. non operative
6th Global Gastroenterologists Meeting
Muhammad S Niam
Brawijaya University, Indonesia
ScientificTracks Abstracts: J Gastrointest Dig Syst
Abstract
Background: Gastric perforation is around 25�30% of acute abdomen cases presented in emergency department, with highly mortality and morbidity rate. Traditionally, laparotomy is believed as a gold standard. However, patients with ASA status �3 and Boey score �2 still had poor outcome. This research presented peritoneal drainage as an alternative to laparotomy for poor prognostic patients. Objective: To determine the success rate of the peritoneal drainage procedure in the poor prognostic patients of gastric perforation cases in Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang. Method: Observational descriptive study was made in gastric perforation patients with the poor prognostics, determined by Boey score �2 and ASA score �3, who underwent laparotomy and peritoneal drainage procedure in RS Syaiful Anwar Malang in 2013. Using SPSS 17.0, the mortality in 30 days after each procedure was presented in crosstabulation and analyzed in crossectional method. Results: 42 gastric perforation patients were in the poor prognostics, 18 patients underwent peritoneal drainage (42.85%), of them, 11 patients survived in for 30 days after the procedure (mortality rate = 38.89%). While of 24 patients who underwent laparotomy (57.14%), only 5 patients survived (mortality rate = 79.16 %). The mortality rate in laparotomy group was greater than peritoneal drainage group (OR: 5.971, CI :95). Conclusion: In gastric perforation, patients with poor prognostics and peritoneal drainage have a better end result as compared with laparotomy procedure.Biography
Muhammad S Niam is General Surgeon, Consultant in Digestive Surgery, Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeon. He is also a Lecturer and Medical Staff of Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Brawijaya University School of Medicine, Malang, Indonesia. Apart from these, he is Chairman of Indonesian Society of General Surgery of Malang Region, National Faculty Member of Indonesian Society of Endo-laparoscopic Surgery and National Faculty Member of Indonesian Society of Coloproctology, and Committee of Asian Society of Colorectal Surgery.
Email: m2sniam@gmail.com
