Previous Page  11 / 15 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 15 Next Page
Page Background

Page 60

Palliative Care 2016

September 29-30, 2016

Volume 6 Issue 5(Suppl)

J Palliat Care Med

ISSN: 2165-7386 JPCM, an open access journal

conferenceseries

.com

September 29-30, 2016 Toronto, Canada

2

nd

Global Congress on

Hospice & Palliative Care

J Palliat Care Med 2016, 6:5(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.C1.006

IMPACT OFAGE AND FINANCIAL STATUS OF PATIENTS OR CAREGIVERS ON PERCEPTIONS

OF HOSPICE CARE AND THE CHOICE OF HOSPICE V. HOSPITAL CARE AT TERMINAL

DIAGNOSIS

Jahnavi Kishore

a

a

Conestoga High School, USA

H

ospice is designed to provide quality end-of-life medical care for patients and support for their families. Most insurance,

including Medicaid, provides hospice benefits. Why then do so few people enter hospice? I hypothesized that the

perception of hospice care as a last resort drives the decision to choose hospital care at terminal diagnosis. However, the data

shows that although a large number of respondents across age and income groups did not regard hospice care as a last resort,

when asked to make a hypothetical decision between hospice and hospital care, they primarily chose hospital care except when

life expectancy was less than 3 months. Subjects aged 30 and under showed higher preference for hospital care even when

given life expectancy of less than 3 months. Respondents were more likely to choose hospital over hospice care when making

the decision for a family member than for themselves. Given 6 months or more to live with a terminal disease, respondents

generally chose hospital care, perhaps in anticipation of a curative option which may not be available for diseases such as end-

stage Alzheimer’s. Thus my hypothesis that the perception of hospice as a last resort drives choice of hospital care at terminal

diagnosis was not proven. Multiple factors affect decision making when life expectancy is 3 months or less. Age and income

do impact the choice; however end-of-life care decisions are clearly more complex and require careful guidance and support.

kishjahn@gmail.com

ASSESSING END-OF-LIFE CARE IN THE ACUTE CARE SETTING

Leah Mercedes Korkis

a

a

Mount Saint Mary’s University, USA

A

growing body of literature has identified significant care deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of care at the end-of-

life (EOL). This is particularly true within the hospital setting, where the existing literature suggests widespread deficiencies

in symptom management, miscommunication, and suffering of both patients and families. This study used a mixed-methods

retrospective correlational design to investigate the EOL care processes and care outcomes within the acute care setting within two

acute care facilities in Los Angeles. Data sources include quanitative and qualitative responses fromcaregivers of deceased patients via

a mortality follow-back survey. A review of the medical records of decedents investigated the relationships among the study variable

of completed mortality follow-back surveys. Results from this study revealed wide variability in the overall perception of EOL care

by 92 caregivers. Some variables were identified as being of great importance to caregivers as evidenced by their frequency within the

narrated comments and correlational strength. Key findings link advance care planning documentation to positive perceptions of

EOL care and the need for further research in communication and pain management.

leah.korkis@gmail.com