Previous Page  2 / 5 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 5 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 6, Issue 4(Suppl)

J Obes Weight Loss Ther

ISSN: 2165-7904 JOWT, an open access journal

Obesity Congress 2016

August 08-10, 2016

Page 22

Notes:

conference

series

.com

Obesity

August 08-10, 2016 Toronto, Canada

6

th

World Congress on

Mark Lemstra, J Obes Weight Loss Ther 2016, 6:4(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.C1.029

Weight-loss intervention adherence levels and factors promoting adherence

Background:

Adhering to weight-loss interventions is difficult for many people. The majority of those who are overweight or

obese and attempt to lose weight are simply not successful. The objectives of this study were 1) to quantify overall adherence

rates for various weight-loss interventions and 2) to provide pooled estimates for factors associated with improved adherence

to weight-loss interventions.

Methods:

We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of all studies published between January 2004 and

August 2015 that reviewed weight-loss intervention adherence.

Results:

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and checking the methodological quality, 27 studies were included in

the meta-analysis. The overall adherence rate was 60.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53.6–67.2). The following three main

variables were found to impact adherence: 1) supervised attendance programs had higher adherence rates than those with

no supervision (RR= 1.65; 95% CI 1.54–1.77); 2) interventions that offered social support had higher adherence than those

without social support (RR= 1.29; 95% CI 1.24–1.34); and 3) dietary intervention alone had higher adherence than exercise

programs alone (RR= 1.27; 95% CI 1.19–1.35).

Conclusion:

A substantial proportion of people do not adhere to weight-loss interventions. Programs supervising attendance,

offering social support, and focusing on dietary modification have better adherence than interventions not supervising

attendance, not offering social support, and focusing exclusively on exercise.

Biography

Mark Lemstra has completed eight university degrees: Bachelor of Science, a Master of Science in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, a PhD in Psychiatry, a

Master of Science in Public Health, a Master of Science in Epidemiology, a Doctor of Science in Public Health, a Doctor of Science in Epidemiology and a PhD in

Epidemiology.

marklemstra@shaw.ca

Mark Lemstra

University of Saskatchewan, Canada