Previous Page  7 / 29 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 29 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 7, Issue 4 (Suppl)

J Neurol Neurophysiol

ISSN:2155-9562 JNN, an open access journal

Page 33

Notes:

Neurology Congress 2016

September 21-23, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

September 21-23, 2016 Amsterdam, Netherlands

8

th

European Neurology Congress

The IASP’s nick-“diagnosis” of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-I), together with its attempted

divination in Budapest, must be interred

José L Ochoa

Oregon Nerve Center, USA

O

ur current IASP President led a distinguished group, who based on science and courage, redefined “neuropathic pain” in

2008, but were reminded that such transparency excluded CRPS-I. Current authorities who agreed on this are Past President;

rejuvenated IASP taxonomists; (the AMA always agreed) and now, the E.N.S. CRPS-I hypothesis (former “RSD” and “SMP) features

include that there is no structural pathology; no diagnostic test; the “objective signs” are non-specific, often reflect disuse or self-

infliction; and some are willful behaviors. Pain experts admit that “for diagnosis we don’t use Evidence, we use our default criterion

#4” because such perversion of the falsifiability principle (the one that allows scientific diagnosis (Popper)) is unfalsifiable (alternative

diagnoses are not eliminated) i.e., it cannot be proven false and this is termed as Pseudoscience. The default position, one that cannot

be proven false, also fits the null hypothesis which can never be proven correct (the data can only reject or fail to reject it (Fisher)).

Topics that will be presented are: Symptoms, signs and laboratory in RSD/CRPS; S.W. Mitchell excludes the great sympathetic” from

“Causalgia; The invention of “RSD” by Evans; R.Verdugo exposes placebo in faulty “diagnostic sympathetic blocks”: SMP and RSD

die; M.Campero rules out sympathetic activation of C nociceptors in CRPS (microneurography); Science of abnormal human nerves

as impulse generators; Neurologists sort true versus Pseudoneurological display which are Psychogenic; The nick-“diagnosis” of

“CRPS-I”, as applied by non-neurologists to pseudoneurological patients: iatrogenic harm; Hysterical versus malingered CRPS; and

what is wrong with the Budapests? This lecture outline will survey sensation, receptor to brain, where psyche lives.

Biography

José L Ochoa is a Specialized Academic Neurologist. He has written hundreds of peer reviewed articles, book chapters, and two books. He has successfully

identified two syndromes of Neuropathic Pain. He has done his MD from Catholic University in 1961. He has done his PhD and DSc from University of London.

joseochoamoreno@yahoo.com

José L Ochoa, J Neurol Neurophysiol 2016, 7:4 (Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.C1.034