Previous Page  15 / 26 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 26 Next Page
Page Background

Page 66

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education | ISSN: 2161-0711 | Volume 8

&

Medical Sociology & Public Health

3

rd

World Congress on

Public health and Epidemic diseases

International Conference on

September 21-22, 2018 | Dallas, USA

Stigma as oppression: Measuring racialized and homophobic stigma and violence in a sample of US black

men who have sex with men

Natalie Leblanc

1

, Hugh Crean, LaRon Nelson, James McMahon

and

Typhanye Dyer

1

University of Rochester, USA

University of Maryland, USA

B

lack men who have sex with men (MSM) investigating and contextualizing multi-faceted social oppression is paramount in

addressing inequities in HIV incidence experienced by this group. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the HIV Prevention

Trial Network (HPTN) 061 study to test measurement properties of social oppression among 1530 US Black MSM. We used

confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to explore the psychometric properties and structure of the HPTN 061 stigma items. Three

measurement models were examined: (1) a 2-factor CFA (Racial Stigma and Homophobic Stigma); (2) a 4-factor CFA (Racial Stigma,

Homophobic Stigma, Racially-motivated Violence and Homophobic-motivated Violence); and (3) a new higher order Stigma latent

construct. We chose 14 items a-priori to assess new racial and homophobic stigma variables (7 items assessed racial-based stigma,

e.g., “Being ignored, overlooked, or not given a service because of my race”; and 7 items assessed homophobic-based stigma, e.g.,

“Being ignored, overlooked, or not given a service because of my sexuality”). Additionally, 6 violent items (3 racially-motivated and 3

homophobic-motivated) were assessed (e.g., “Being threatened with a gun, knife, or another weapon because of my race/sexuality”).

Participants rated the impact of the event in the preceding week from 0=” has never happened to me” to 5=” bothers me extremely”.

These severity ratings were used in each CFA. Overall, 77% reported some form of racial stigma with 63% reporting homophobic

stigma. In each model, standardized factor loadings exceeded 0.63 for all items. Regarding violent experiences, 45% reported some

form of racially-motivated violence with 42% reporting some form of homophobic-motivated violence. For all models, standardized

factor loadings were all above 0.62 with most being above 0.75. Higher order standardized factor loadings were all above 0.7. The

discussion will focus on naming new latent constructs, analysis strategies and limitations and the utility of higher-order factors.

natalie_leblanc@urmc.rochester.edu

J Community Med Health Educ 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711-C4-042