9 / 10
Page 40
conferenceseries
.com
Volume 8
Journal of Palliative Care & Medicine
Hospice 2018
July 18-19, 2018
July 18-19, 2018 Melbourne, Australia
5
th
World Congress on
Hospice and Palliative Care
Good death and subjectivity: Governmentality analysis in palliative care
Keyla C Montenegro
University of the West of Scotland, UK
T
he study is sought to explore the dying process as a phenomenon inwhich relations of power occur in the formof governance
of conduct in palliative care settings in Brasilia/Brazil. The findings revealed a real concern from both practitioners and
non-practitioners about quality of death. It became evident that quality of death is a common objective in palliative care
practice, but significant differences were found in regarding to what quality of death means. Analysis of discourse revealed
that normative ideas of what a good death is and how to obtain it through palliative care conflicted directly with someone who
understood a good death differently. With that said, good death became a contested space between two different cultures. The
palliative care practitioners that participated in this study showed that there are tendencies to achieve the best quality of death
possible. It also showed a normative narrative of a good death based on the Western palliative care movement. The palliative
care narrative of a good death has established a constricted image of what a good death should be transforming it into not
only a norm, but also in the ultimate objective of palliative care practitioners. We then concluded that the term ‘good death’
is functioning as a rhetorical device used by practitioners to conduct the conduct of patients and their families to achieve a
certain way of death.
keyla.montenegro@uws.ac.ukJ Palliat Care Med 2018, Volume 8
DOI: 10.4172/2165-7386-C1-015