Research Article |
Open Access |
|
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi1* and Giovanni Del Puente2 |
1School of Public Health, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy |
2Psychiatry Department, DINOG, Department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Genetics, University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy |
*Corresponding authors: |
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
School of Public Health
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL)
University of Genoa
Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy
Tel: +39 0103538508
Fax: +39 0103538541
E-mail: robertobragazzi@gmail.com |
|
|
Received August 19, 2012; Published September 28, 2012 |
|
Citation: Bragazzi NL, Puente GD (2012) Musical Attitudes and Correlations with Mental Health in a Sample of Musicians, Non-Musicians and Immigrants: A Pilot Study. Implications for Music Therapy. 1:366. doi:10.4172/scientificreports.366 |
|
Copyright: © 2012 Bragazzi NL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
|
Abstract |
|
A sample of 81 subjects (of which 22 were females, 17 musicians and 9 immigrants) accepted to take part in the study and were asked about their music attitudes and self-administered SCL90-R questionnaire (Symptom checklist 90 revised), developed by Leonard Derogatis. Data analysis showed that musical attitudes, use of music (recreational/instrumental versus non instrumental/emotional), music complexity and music preferences strongly vary between musicians and non-musicians and correlate with mental status, while no statistically significant difference was found between Italian and immigrant participants and for parameters like gender and age, thus suggesting that music may be a universal factor and that only musical training makes the difference. Musicians tend to have higher SCL90-R values than non-musicians, especially with a statistically significant difference in the depression, anxiety and phobic traits sub-scales. We speculate that these traits of a particularly vulnerable and sensitive personality may have led the subject to wish to become a professional musician, using music as a kind of auto-medication. Here in this manuscript, we discuss further research and clinically relevant implications for music therapy. |
|
Keywords |
|
Music psychology; Music therapy; Psychometric scale |
|
Introduction |
|
Music represents the most popular and important leisure activity in the nowadays society [1]. Over the last decades, researchers have widely investigated people’s musical preferences as an individual difference variable linked with personality traits [2-6], also from a developmental perspective [7]. Experimental findings and results have supported the hypothesis that people prefer listening to music that reflects their personality traits [8,9]. Music has been studied using an array of interdisciplinary approaches and has been broadly linked to a variety of psychological functions: it seems to exert its effect on emotions [10,11] modulating above all the limbic and paralimbic pathways [12], memory [13], attention [14], intelligence [15] and cognition [16] stimulating neuroplasticity [17]. |
|
Recently, studies have investigated the differences between musicians and non-musicians in terms of neuroanatomical [18], physiological [19,20] and neuropsychological [21-23] differences. Little is known instead about differences in terms of music preferences [24] and mental health. Some scholars have claimed that musicians tend to be more neurotic and even more religious than non musicians [25,26] but these findings should be investigated in more depth. |
|
Materials and Methods |
|
All the subjects that accepted to take part in the study gave their informed consent. Using a written structured questionnaire, they were asked in the first part about their general demographic parameters (gender, age, self-reported nationality, profession and income) and in the second part were asked to provide the title of only one favourite song – we meant a song they used to listen to regularly in the last two weeks. It is well-known in fact that music preference can vary according to many factors, even though stability tends to increase in the adults. |
|
As far as profession is concerned, for musician we meant a person who makes music as a job, not a person generally interested or skilled in music. |
|
Musical style and genre of the chosen song was classified using one of these 8 macro-genres: rock, pop, funky, jazz, popular music (musica cantautoriale in italian), dance, and classical. Music labelling was performed by two independent reviewers and in case of disagreement a third reviewer and a musician (who did not take part into this study) managed to come to a solution by discussion. In all the cases, Cohen's kappa coefficient were high (>95%) and satisfactory. |
|
Another parameter we investigated was the use of music [1,27]: subjects had to choose between recreational/instrumental and non instrumental/emotional options. For recreational/instrumental use we meant that music was used most of the time during parties, as a background or anyway not to modulate/enhance one's own emotions (which was the case of non instrumental/emotional use). |
|
Subjects were self-administered SCL90-R (Symptom checklist revised 90), developed by Derogatis, and data were analyzed and scored according to the reference Manual [28]. |
|
Statistical analysis (ANOVA-one way, Fisher's exact test, Cohen's kappa coefficient) was carried out with proper software, namely SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp.) and values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. |
|
Results |
|
81 subjects accepted to take part into the study. The sample had a mean age of 29.49 ± 9.01 years, with an age range of 18-54 years, females were 22 (27.16 % of the total population), while musicians were 17 (20.99% of the total population), and immigrants 9 (11.11 % of the total population), properly classified as immigrants according to their self-reported nationality. |
|
SCL90-R scores of musicians were generally higher than non musicians obtained values, and depression, anxiety, phobic traits subscales were different between the groups in a statistically significant way (p-value 0.033, p-value 0.000, p-value 0.000, respectively), as shown in table 1. Age difference between musician sample and non musician sample was not statistically significant (p-value 0.070). |
|
|
Table 1: Sub-scales scores for musicians, non-musicians and corresponding pvalues obtained with ANOVA-one way. |
|
|
Comparing SCL90-R scores of musicians and immigrants, the same trend as described before was observed, but in this case only anxiety and phobic traits sub-scales exhibited a statistically significant difference. Interestingly in this case depression sub-scale was not statistically significant, as can be seen in table 2. |
|
|
|
Table 2: Sub-scales scores for musicians, immigrants and corresponding p-values obtained with ANOVA-one way. |
|
|
From table 3, we can see that the most listened musical genre is pop music, thus confirming other studies [1]. But if we compare the music preferences among the group, we can observe that the musicians have music preferences which are different from those of non-musicians in a statistically significant way (classical music p-value 0.001, jazz p-value 0.005), while there are no differences between Italians and immigrants. Immigrants and musicians show some different music preferences (rock p-value 0.028). |
|
|
Table 3: Music preferences among musicians, non musicians, immigrants. |
|
|
From tables 4 and 5, we observe that gender and age have no effect on music preferences in a statistical significant way. As far as use of music is concerned, 17 subjects (20.99% of the total population) chose non instrumental/emotional option and if we compare among the groups, we find statistically significant difference between non-musicians and musicians (p-value 0.000), between migrants and musicians (p-value 0.015), but again not between migrants and Italians. |
|
|
Table 4: Gender influence on music preference. |
|
|
|
Table 5: Age influence on music preference. |
|
|
Discussion |
|
The current study attempts to study correlations between music (musical attitudes, use of music, music complexity, and music preferences) and mental health. This topic is of great importance in the frame of music therapy. |
|
Some scholars emphasized that in order to fully exploit music benefits only theory-driven theory should be designed and used in clinical practice and that the lack of theoretical study can lead to the failure of the therapeutic project [29,30]. |
|
Studying musicians' personality could foster further development in both music therapy research and music therapy applications and help us to understand why and how music therapy is really effective. |
|
From our experimental findings, music is a universal factor [31]: in our sample we found no statistically significant differences for age, gender and nationality among the groups. Different preferences between musicians and non-musicians may reflect a different sensibility and personality trait, as can be seen from higher SCL90-R scores and statistically significant difference for depression, anxiety, phobic sub-scales. We speculate that this could have motivated the person to wish to become a musician: music as auto-medication, as a kind of self-administered therapy. Musicians in fact use music to modulate and enhance their feelings and emotion and prefer well-structured and complex music such as jazz and classical music, suggesting that complex music can strengthen their personality, feeding and spiritually nourishing them. |
|
This could help to select and design music therapy programs ad hoc. Moreover, these programs can be extended also to immigrants with mental difficulties currently in Italy, since there are no limitations, music being a universal value and language. |
|
Further research is needed in order to establish and find other potential link and correlation useful in music therapy clinical routine practice. |
|
|
References |
|
- North AC, Hargreaves DJ, Hargreaves JJ (2004) Uses of Music in Everyday Life. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22: 41-77
- Dollinger SJ (1993) Research note: Personality and music preference: Extraversion and excitement seeking or openness to experience? Psychology of Music 21: 73-77.
- Little P, Zuckerman M (1986) Sensation seeking and music preferences. Pers Individ Dif 7: 575-578.
- McCown W, Keiser R, Mulhearn S, Williamson D (1997) The role of personality and gender in preferences for exaggerated bass in music. Pers Individ Dif 23: 543-547.
- Robinson TO, Weaver JB, Zillmann D (1996) Exploring the relation between personality and the appreciation of rock music. Psychol Rep 78: 259-269.
- Chamorro-Premuzic T, Furnham A (2007) Personality and music: Can traits explain how people use music in everyday life? Br J Psychol 98: 175-185.
- Holbrook MB, Schindler RM (1989) Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. J Consum Res 16: 119-124.
- Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD (2003) The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. J Pers Soc Psychol 84: 1236-1256.
- Schwartz KD, Fouts GT (2003) Music preferences, personality style, and developmental issues of adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 32: 205-213.
- Juslin PN, Laukka P (2004) Expression, Perception, and Induction of Musical Emotions: A Review and a Questionnaire Study of Everyday Listening. Journal of New Music Research 33: 217-238.
- Kallinen K, Ravaja N (2006) Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same and different. Musicae Scientaie 10: 191-213.
- Brown S, Martinez MJ, Parsons LM (2004) Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems. Neuroreport 15: 2033-2037.
- Snyder B (2000) Music and Memory: An Introduction. MIT Press.
- Scheufele PM (2000) Effects of Progressive Relaxation and Classical Music on Measurements of Attention, Relaxation, and Stress Responses. J Behav Med 23: 207-228.
- Chamorro-Premuzic T, Goma-i-Freixanet M, Furnham A, Muro A (2009) Personality, Self-Estimated Intelligence, and Uses of Music: A Spanish Replication and Extension Using Structural Equation Modeling. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3: 149-155
- Rodrigues AC, Loureiro MA, Caramelli P (2010) Musical training, neuroplasticity and cognition. Dement Neuropsychol 4: 277-286.
- Münte TF, Altenmüller E, Jäncke L (2002) The musician’s brain as a model ofneuroplasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 473-478.
- Gaser C, Schlaug G (2003) Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians. The Journal of Neuroscience 23: 9240-9245.
- Bernardi L, Porta C, Sleight P (2006) Cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory changes induced by different types of music in musicians and non-musicians: the importance of silence. Heart 92: 445-452.
- Claudia I, Nicolás T, Daniel G, Jose AP (2008) Heart rate in professional musicians. J Occup Med Toxicol 3:16.
- Brandler S, Rammsayer TH (2003) Differences in Mental Abilities between Musicians and Non-Musicians. Psychology of Music 31: 123-138
- Helmbold N, Rammsayer T, Altenmüller E (2005) Differences in Primary Mental Abilities between Musicians and Nonmusicians. Journal of Individual Differences 26: 74-85.
- Ragert P, Schmidt A, Altenmüller E, Dinse HR (2004) Superior tactile performance and learning in professional pianists: evidence for meta-plasticity in musicians. Eur J Neurosci 19: 473-478.
- Fung CV (1996) Musicians' and nonmusicians' preferences for world musics: Relation to musical characteristics and familiarity. Journal of Research in Music Education Spring 44: 60-83.
- Shuter-Dyson R (2000) Profiling Music Students: Personality and Religiosity. Psychology of Music 28: 190-196
- Anthony E. Kemp (1996) The Musical Temperament: Psychology and Personality of Musicians. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Sutherland ME, Grewe O, Egermann H, Nagel F, Kopiez R, et al. (2009) The influence of social situations on music listening. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1169: 363-367.
- Derogatis LR (1996) Symptom checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R): Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN, National Computer Systems, Pearson.
- Jeong S, Kim MT (2007) Effects of a theory-driven music and movement program for stroke survivors in a community setting. Appl Nurs Res 20: 125-131.
- Wosch T, Wigram T (2007) Microanalysis in music therapy: methods, techniques and applications for clinicians, researches, educators and students. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Fritz T, Jentschke S, Gosselin N, Sammler D, Peretz I, et al. (2009) Universal Recognition of Three Basic Emotions in Music. Curr Biol 19: 573-576.
|
|
|